Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23841587›Full record

ArticleInorganic chemistry2013

Coupling fast water exchange to slow molecular tumbling in Gd3+ chelates: why faster is not always better.

Stefano Avedano, Mauro Botta, Julian S Haigh, Dario L Longo, Mark Woods

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Inorganic chemistry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Crystal Structures of DOTMA Chelates from CeChemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Structural Features of Europium(II)-Containing Cryptates That Influence Relaxivity.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Gd-TEMDO: Design, Synthesis, and MRI Application.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2016
    Article
  12. Basic MR relaxation mechanisms and contrast agent design.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2015
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stefano AvedanoDipartimento di Scienze e Innovazione Tecnologica, Università del Piemonte Orientale Amedeo Avogadro, Viale T. Michel 11, I-15121 Alessandria, Italy.
Mauro Botta
Julian S Haigh
Dario L Longo
Mark Woods

Funding

Improving the Effectiveness of ParaCEST Agents by Controlling the ConformationR21EB011687 · NIBIB · PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WOODS, MARK · 2010 to 2011
$337k
NIBIB NIH HHS EB-11687NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB011687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The influence of dynamics on solution state structure is a widely overlooked consideration in chemistry. Variations in Gd(3+) chelate hydration with changing coordination geometry and dissociative water exchange kinetics substantially impact the effectiveness (or relaxivity) of monohydrated Gd(3+) chelates as T1-shortening contrast agents for MRI. Theory shows that relaxivity is highly dependent upon the Gd(3+)-water proton distance (rGdH), and yet this distance is almost never considered as a variable in assessing the relaxivity of a Gd(3+) chelate as a potential contrast agent. The consequence of this omission can be seen when considering the relaxivity of isomeric Gd(3+) chelates that exhibit different dissociative water exchange kinetics. The results described herein show that the relaxivity of a chelate with "optimal" dissociative water exchange kinetics is actually lower than that of an isomeric chelate with "suboptimal" dissociative water exchange. When the rate of molecular tumbling of these chelates is slowed, an approach that has long been understood to increase relaxivity, the observed difference in relaxivity is increased with the more rapidly exchanging ("optimal") chelate exhibiting lower relaxivity than the "suboptimally" exchanging isomer. The difference between the chelates arises from a non-field-dependent parameter: either the hydration number (q) or rGdH. For solution state Gd(3+) chelates, changes in the values of q and rGdH are indistinguishable. These parametric expressions simply describe the hydration state of the chelate--i.e., the number and position of closely associating water molecules. The hydration state (q/rGdH(6)) of a chelate is intrinsically linked to its dissociative water exchange rate kex, and the interrelation of these parameters must be considered when examining the relaxivity of Gd(3+) chelates. The data presented herein indicate that the changes in the hydration parameter (q/rGdH(6)) associated with changing dissociative water exchange kinetics has a profound effect on relaxivity and suggest that achieving the highest relaxivities in monohydrated Gd(3+) chelates is more complicated than simply "optimizing" dissociative water exchange kinetics.

Indexed as

beta-CyclodextrinsChelating AgentsGadoliniumHumansKineticsModels, MolecularMolecular ConformationOrganometallic CompoundsSerum AlbuminTemperatureWaterbeta-CyclodextrinsChelating AgentsGadoliniumOrganometallic CompoundsSerum AlbuminWater

Identifiers

PMID23841587
PMCPMC3769110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.