Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23841024›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2013

Mouse models for colorectal cancer.

Baktiar O Karim, David L Huso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Cas9-expressing chickens and pigs as resources for genome editing in livestock.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Hedgehog Signaling in Colorectal Cancer: All in the Stroma?International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The Mechanism ofThe Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Baktiar O KarimDepartment of Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, The Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
David L Huso

Funding

Zebrafish CoreP01CA134292 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LEACH, STEVEN D · 2009 to 2013
$7.4M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA134292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States, with the number of affected people increasing. There are many risk factors that increase CRC risk, including family or personal history of CRC, smoking, consumption of red meat, obesity, and alcohol consumption. Conversely, increased screening, maintaining healthy body weight, not smoking, and limiting intake of red meat are all associated with reduced CRC morbidity and mortality. Mouse models of CRC were first used in 1928 and have played an important role in understanding CRC biology and treatment and have long been instrumental in clarifying the pathobiology of CRC formation and inhibition. This review focuses on advancements in modeling CRC in mice.

Indexed as

ApcColorectal cancerFAPHNPCChumanmouse modelsstem cellstumorigenesis

Identifiers

PMID23841024
PMCPMC3696531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.