Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23840949›Full record

ArticleNursing research and practice2013

Recruiting for epigenetic research: facilitating the informed consent process.

Nancy Jallo, Debra E Lyon, Patricia Anne Kinser, Debra Lynch Kelly, Victoria Menzies, Colleen Jackson-Cook

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing research and practice, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nancy JalloSchool of Nursing, Virginia Commonwealth University, P.O. Box 980567, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.
Debra E Lyon
Patricia Anne Kinser
Debra Lynch Kelly
Victoria Menzies
Colleen Jackson-Cook

Funding

Epigenetics and Psychoneurologic Symptoms in Women with Breast CancerR01NR012667 · NINR · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON-COOK, COLLEEN K, LYON, DEBRA E · 2010 to 2014
$3.1M
Center of Excellence in Biobehavioral Approaches to Symptom ManagementP30NR011403 · NINR · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI GRAP, MARY JO · 2009 to 2013
$2.2M
NINR NIH HHS P30 NR011403NINR NIH HHS R01 NR012667
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because the effects of epigenetic (gene-environment interaction) changes have been associated with numerous adverse health states, the study of epigenetic measures provides exciting research opportunities for biobehavioral scientists. However, recruitment for studies focusing on any aspect of genetics poses challenges. Multiple factors, including lack of knowledge regarding a research study, have been identified as barriers to recruitment. Strengthening the informed consent process through extended discussion has been found to be effective in recruiting for research studies in general, yet there is a paucity of information that focused on such a recruitment strategy for epigenetic studies. In this paper, we share our experiences with strategies to strengthen the informed consent process as well as provide samples of materials developed to heighten potential participants' understanding of epigenetics, in 4 epigenetic research studies with women from diverse backgrounds experiencing a range of health issues. The combined enrollment success rate for epigenetic studies using the process was 89% with participants representing a diverse population. We posit that carefully developed recruitment scripts provided a foundation for improving potential participants' understanding of the research project. Easy to understand illustrations of the epigenetic process provided a basis for active engagement and encouraged individual questions.

Identifiers

PMID23840949
PMCPMC3690242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.