Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23840710›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2013

Size-based isolation of circulating tumor cells in lung cancer patients using a microcavity array system.

Masahito Hosokawa, Hirotsugu Kenmotsu, Yasuhiro Koh, Tomoko Yoshino, Takayuki Yoshikawa, Tateaki Naito, Toshiaki Takahashi, Haruyasu Murakami, Yukiko Nakamura, Asuka Tsuya and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 175 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Circulating Tumor Cells: Emerging Frontiers in Cancer Technology.Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. A Simulation of the Effects of Diffusion on Hyperpolarized [1-IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Clinical and prognostic significance of detectingTranslational lung cancer research · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Masahito HosokawaDivision of Biotechnology and Life Science, Institute of Engineering, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirotsugu Kenmotsu
Yasuhiro Koh
Tomoko Yoshino
Takayuki Yoshikawa
Tateaki Naito
Toshiaki Takahashi
Haruyasu Murakami
Yukiko Nakamura
Asuka Tsuya
Takehito Shukuya
Akira Ono
Hiroaki Akamatsu
Reiko Watanabe
Sachiyo Ono
Keita Mori
Hisashige Kanbara
Ken Yamaguchi
Tsuyoshi Tanaka
Tadashi Matsunaga
Nobuyuki Yamamoto
Shizuoka Cancer Center · JPTokyo University of Agriculture and Technology · JPHitachi (Japan) · JPLife Science Institute · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM)-based enumeration of circulating tumor cells (CTC) has prognostic value in patients with solid tumors, such as advanced breast, colon, and prostate cancer. However, poor sensitivity has been reported for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To address this problem, we developed a microcavity array (MCA) system integrated with a miniaturized device for CTC isolation without relying on EpCAM expression. Here, we report the results of a clinical study on CTCs of advanced lung cancer patients in which we compared the MCA system with the CellSearch system, which employs the conventional EpCAM-based method.

methodsPaired peripheral blood samples were collected from 43 metastatic lung cancer patients to enumerate CTCs using the CellSearch system according to the manufacturer's protocol and the MCA system by immunolabeling and cytomorphological analysis. The presence of CTCs was assessed blindly and independently by both systems.

resultsCTCs were detected in 17 of 22 NSCLC patients using the MCA system versus 7 of 22 patients using the CellSearch system. On the other hand, CTCs were detected in 20 of 21 small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients using the MCA system versus 12 of 21 patients using the CellSearch system. Significantly more CTCs in NSCLC patients were detected by the MCA system (median 13, range 0-291 cells/7.5 mL) than by the CellSearch system (median 0, range 0-37 cells/7.5 ml) demonstrating statistical superiority (p = 0.0015). Statistical significance was not reached in SCLC though the trend favoring the MCA system over the CellSearch system was observed (p = 0.2888). The MCA system also isolated CTC clusters from patients who had been identified as CTC negative using the CellSearch system.

conclusionsThe MCA system has a potential to isolate significantly more CTCs and CTC clusters in advanced lung cancer patients compared to the CellSearch system.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, NeoplasmCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCell Adhesion MoleculesCell CountCell Line, TumorEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingPrognosisAntigens, NeoplasmCell Adhesion MoleculesEpithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule

Identifiers

PMID23840710
PMCPMC3696066
OpenAlexW1993998781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.