Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23840636›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Staphylococcus epidermidis in orthopedic device infections: the role of bacterial internalization in human osteoblasts and biofilm formation.

Florent Valour, Sophie Trouillet-Assant, Jean-Philippe Rasigade, Sébastien Lustig, Emmanuel Chanard, Hélène Meugnier, Sylvestre Tigaud, François Vandenesch, Jérome Etienne, Tristan Ferry and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Effects of Tranexamic Acid in Combination with Teicoplanin AgainstInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Microbiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. WGS Analysis ofInfection and drug resistance · 2024
    Article
  10. Aqueous Extracts from Hemp Seeds as a New Weapon againstInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. The road to success of coagulase-negative staphylococci: clinical significance of small colony variants and their pathogenic role in persistent infections.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. AcuteJournal of hand surgery global online · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Florent ValourINSERM U1111, International Center for Research in Infectiology, Lyon, France. florent.valour@chu-lyon.fr
Sophie Trouillet-Assant
Jean-Philippe Rasigade
Sébastien Lustig
Emmanuel Chanard
Hélène Meugnier
Sylvestre Tigaud
François Vandenesch
Jérome Etienne
Tristan Ferry
Frédéric Laurent
Lyon BJI Study Group
Lyon College · USCentre International de Recherche en Infectiologie · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRInserm · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStaphylococcus epidermidis orthopedic device infections are caused by direct inoculation of commensal flora during surgery and remain rare, although S. epidermidis carriage is likely universal. We wondered whether S. epidermidis orthopedic device infection strains might constitute a sub-population of commensal isolates with specific virulence ability. Biofilm formation and invasion of osteoblasts by S. aureus contribute to bone and joint infection recurrence by protecting bacteria from the host-immune system and most antibiotics. We aimed to determine whether S. epidermidis orthopedic device infection isolates could be distinguished from commensal strains by their ability to invade osteoblasts and form biofilms. MATERIALS AND

methodsOrthopedic device infection S. epidermidis strains (n = 15) were compared to nasal carriage isolates (n = 22). Osteoblast invasion was evaluated in an ex vivo infection model using MG63 osteoblastic cells co-cultured for 2 hours with bacteria. Adhesion of S. epidermidis to osteoblasts was explored by a flow cytometric approach, and internalized bacteria were quantified by plating cell lysates after selective killing of extra-cellular bacteria with gentamicin. Early and mature biofilm formations were evaluated by a crystal violet microtitration plate assay and the Biofilm Ring Test method.

resultsNo difference was observed between commensal and infective strains in their ability to invade osteoblasts (internalization rate 308+/-631 and 347+/-431 CFU/well, respectively). This low internalization rate correlated with a low ability to adhere to osteoblasts. No difference was observed for biofilm formation between the two groups.

conclusionOsteoblast invasion and biofilm formation levels failed to distinguish S. epidermidis orthopedic device infection strains from commensal isolates. This study provides the first assessment of the interaction between S. epidermidis strains isolated from orthopedic device infections and osteoblasts, and suggests that bone cell invasion is not a major pathophysiological mechanism in S. epidermidis orthopedic device infections, contrary to what is observed for S. aureus.

Indexed as

BiofilmsBacterial AdhesionCell LineElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansOsteoblastsPhylogenyPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthProstheses and ImplantsProsthesis-Related InfectionsStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus epidermidisVirulence

Identifiers

PMID23840636
PMCPMC3696042
OpenAlexW2014718627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.