Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23840618›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Two doses of candidate TB vaccine MVA85A in antiretroviral therapy (ART) naïve subjects gives comparable immunogenicity to one dose in ART+ subjects.

Tandakha N Dieye, Birahim P Ndiaye, Alle B Dieng, Marema Fall, Nathaniel Brittain, Nathaniel Britain, Samantha Vermaak, Makhtar Camara, Halimatou Diop-Ndiaye, Ndeye Fatou Ngom-Gueye and 5 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00731471 (A Phase I Study Evaluating the Safety and Immunogenicity of a New TB Vaccine, MVA85A, in Healthy Volunteers Who Are Infected With HIV), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00731471 phase1completednot on this map

A Phase I Study Evaluating the Safety and Immunogenicity of a New TB Vaccine, MVA85A, in Healthy Volunteers Who Are Infected With HIV

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2008 to 2011Enrolled24ConditionsTuberculosisArmsMVA85A
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. MVA85A vaccine to enhance BCG for preventing tuberculosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Britain, Nathaniel [corrected to Brittain, Nathaniel]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tandakha N DieyeLaboratoire de Bacteriolgie-Virologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Le Dantec, Dakar, Senegal.
Birahim P Ndiaye
Alle B Dieng
Marema Fall
Nathaniel Brittain
Nathaniel Britain
Samantha Vermaak
Makhtar Camara
Halimatou Diop-Ndiaye
Ndeye Fatou Ngom-Gueye
Papa A Diaw
Coumba Toure-Kane
Papa S Sow
Souleymane Mboup
Helen McShane
Hôpital Aristide Le Dantec · SNCentre Hospitalier National Universitaire de Fann · SNUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 076943/Z/05/ZWellcome Trust 095780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) is a global public health problem exacerbated by the HIV epidemic. Here we evaluate a candidate TB vaccine, MVA85A, in a Phase I study in HIV-infected adults in Senegal. 24 patients were enrolled: Group 1∶12, antiretroviral therapy (ART) naïve, adults, with CD4 counts >300 and HIV RNA load <100,000 copies/ml. Group 2∶12 adults, stable on ART, with CD4 counts >300, and an undetectable HIV RNA load. Safety was evaluated by occurrence of local and systemic adverse events (AEs) and by monitoring of CD4 count, HIV RNA load, haematology and biochemistry. Immunogenicity was evaluated by ex-vivo interferon-gamma ELISpot assay. 87.7% of AEs were mild; 11.6% were moderate; and 0.7% were severe. 29.2% of AEs were systemic; 70.8% were expected local AEs. There were no vaccine-related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) or clinically significant effects on HIV RNA load or CD4 count. In ART naive subjects, the first MVA85A immunisation induced a significant immune response at 1 and 4 weeks post-immunisation, which contracted to baseline by 12 weeks. Durability of immunogenicity in subjects on ART persisted out to 24 weeks post-vaccination. A second dose of MVA85A at 12 months enhanced immunogenicity in ART naïve subjects. Subjects on ART had higher responses after the first vaccination compared with ART naïve subjects; responses were comparable after 2 immunisations. In conclusion, MVA85A is well-tolerated and immunogenic in HIV-infected subjects in Senegal. A two dose regimen in ART naïve subjects is comparable in immunogenicity to a single dose in subjects on ART. Clinicaltrials.gov trial identifier NCT00731471.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-HIV AgentsCD4 Lymphocyte CountCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCells, CulturedDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansImmunization, SecondaryImmunocompromised HostInterferon-gammaMaleMiddle AgedTuberculosis, PulmonaryAnti-HIV AgentsInterferon-gammaTuberculosis Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID23840618
PMCPMC3696007
OpenAlexW2073862535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.