Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23840448›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Evaluation of the effectiveness of malaria vector control measures in urban settings of Dakar by a specific anopheles salivary biomarker.

Papa Makhtar Drame, Abdoulaye Diallo, Anne Poinsignon, Olayide Boussari, Stephanie Dos Santos, Vanessa Machault, Richard Lalou, Sylvie Cornelie, Jean-Yves LeHesran, Franck Remoue

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. eLife · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Spatial, environmental, and individual associations withFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Papa Makhtar DrameInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), UMR-MIVEGEC (IRD224-CNRS5290- Universites Montpellier 1 et 2), Montpellier, France. papa-makhtar.drame@ird.fr
Abdoulaye Diallo
Anne Poinsignon
Olayide Boussari
Stephanie Dos Santos
Vanessa Machault
Richard Lalou
Sylvie Cornelie
Jean-Yves LeHesran
Franck Remoue

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standard entomological methods for evaluating the impact of vector control lack sensitivity in low-malaria-risk areas. The detection of human IgG specific to Anopheles gSG6-P1 salivary antigen reflects a direct measure of human-vector contact. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a range of vector control measures (VCMs) in urban settings by using this biomarker approach. The study was conducted from October to December 2008 on 2,774 residents of 45 districts of urban Dakar. IgG responses to gSG6-P1 and the use of malaria VCMs highly varied between districts. At the district level, specific IgG levels significantly increased with age and decreased with season and with VCM use. The use of insecticide-treated nets, by drastically reducing specific IgG levels, was by far the most efficient VCM regardless of age, season or exposure level to mosquito bites. The use of spray bombs was also associated with a significant reduction of specific IgG levels, whereas the use of mosquito coils or electric fans/air conditioning did not show a significant effect. Human IgG response to gSG6-P1 as biomarker of vector exposure represents a reliable alternative for accurately assessing the effectiveness of malaria VCM in low-malaria-risk areas. This biomarker tool could be especially relevant for malaria control monitoring and surveillance programmes in low-exposure/low-transmission settings.

Indexed as

Mosquito ControlAdolescentAdultAnimalsAnophelesChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GInsect Bites and StingsInsecticide-Treated BednetsInsect ProteinsInsect RepellentsInsect VectorsMalariaImmunoglobulin GInsect ProteinsInsect RepellentsSalivary Proteins and Peptides

Identifiers

PMID23840448
PMCPMC3688790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.