ArticlePloS one2013
Multicellular computing using conjugation for wiring.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the computing power of microbes that shapes the environment.Current opinion in microbiology · 2026Review
- Why cellular computations challenge our design principles.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2025Review
- Standardized Quorum Sensing Tools for Gram-Negative Bacteria.ACS synthetic biology · 2025Article
- Genetic designs for stochastic and probabilistic biocomputing.Physical review. E · 2025Article
- Engineering intercellular communication using M13 phagemid and CRISPR-based gene regulation for multicellular computing in Escherichia coli.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Biocomputation: Moving Beyond Turing with Living Cellular Computers.Communications of the ACM · 2024Article
- Synthetic Homoserine Lactone Sensors for Gram-PositiveACS synthetic biology · 2024Article
- Pressure-dependent growth controls 3D architecture of Pseudomonas putida microcolonies.Environmental microbiology reports · 2023Article
- Addressable and adaptable intercellular communication via DNA messaging.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Article
- Implementing re-configurable biological computation with distributed multicellular consortia.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- Calibrating spatiotemporal models of microbial communities to microscopy data: A review.PLoS computational biology · 2022Review
- Ten future challenges for synthetic biology.Engineering biology · 2021Review
- A Framework for Implementing Metaheuristic Algorithms Using Intercellular Communication.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
- From Microbial Communities to Distributed Computing Systems.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Pathways to cellular supremacy in biocomputing.Nature communications · 2019Review
- Dynamical Task Switching in Cellular Computers.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- An Automated Design Framework for Multicellular Recombinase Logic.ACS synthetic biology · 2018Article
- Computing with biological switches and clocks.Natural computing · 2018Article
- Predictive Modeling of a Batch Filter Mating Process.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent efforts in synthetic biology have focussed on the implementation of logical functions within living cells. One aim is to facilitate both internal "re-programming" and external control of cells, with potential applications in a wide range of domains. However, fundamental limitations on the degree to which single cells may be re-engineered have led to a growth of interest in multicellular systems, in which a "computation" is distributed over a number of different cell types, in a manner analogous to modern computer networks. Within this model, individual cell type perform specific sub-tasks, the results of which are then communicated to other cell types for further processing. The manner in which outputs are communicated is therefore of great significance to the overall success of such a scheme. Previous experiments in distributed cellular computation have used global communication schemes, such as quorum sensing (QS), to implement the "wiring" between cell types. While useful, this method lacks specificity, and limits the amount of information that may be transferred at any one time. We propose an alternative scheme, based on specific cell-cell conjugation. This mechanism allows for the direct transfer of genetic information between bacteria, via circular DNA strands known as plasmids. We design a multi-cellular population that is able to compute, in a distributed fashion, a Boolean XOR function. Through this, we describe a general scheme for distributed logic that works by mixing different strains in a single population; this constitutes an important advantage of our novel approach. Importantly, the amount of genetic information exchanged through conjugation is significantly higher than the amount possible through QS-based communication. We provide full computational modelling and simulation results, using deterministic, stochastic and spatially-explicit methods. These simulations explore the behaviour of one possible conjugation-wired cellular computing system under different conditions, and provide baseline information for future laboratory implementations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.