ArticlePloS one2013
Intracellular Neural Recording with Pure Carbon Nanotube Probes.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Carbon fiber electrodes for intracellular recording and stimulation.Journal of neural engineering · 2021Article
- Bioinspired flexible electronics for seamless neural interfacing and chronic recording.Nanoscale advances · 2020Review
- Engineering microscale systems for fully autonomous intracellular neural interfaces.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2020Article
- A Review: Electrode and Packaging Materials for Neurophysiology Recording Implants.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Recent Progress on Non-Conventional Microfabricated Probes for the Chronic Recording of Cortical Neural Activity.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Fluidic Microactuation of Flexible Electrodes for Neural Recording.Nano letters · 2018Article
- Neural Probes for Chronic Applications.Micromachines · 2016Review
- The cardiac effects of carbon nanotubes in rat.BioImpacts : BI · 2016Article
- Article
- Scale of Carbon Nanomaterials Affects Neural Outgrowth and Adhesion.IEEE transactions on nanobioscience · 2016Article
- Penetration of cell membranes and synthetic lipid bilayers by nanoprobes.Biophysical journal · 2014Article
- Nanostructures: a platform for brain repair and augmentation.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The computational complexity of the brain depends in part on a neuron's capacity to integrate electrochemical information from vast numbers of synaptic inputs. The measurements of synaptic activity that are crucial for mechanistic understanding of brain function are also challenging, because they require intracellular recording methods to detect and resolve millivolt- scale synaptic potentials. Although glass electrodes are widely used for intracellular recordings, novel electrodes with superior mechanical and electrical properties are desirable, because they could extend intracellular recording methods to challenging environments, including long term recordings in freely behaving animals. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) can theoretically deliver this advance, but the difficulty of assembling CNTs has limited their application to a coating layer or assembly on a planar substrate, resulting in electrodes that are more suitable for in vivo extracellular recording or extracellular recording from isolated cells. Here we show that a novel, yet remarkably simple, millimeter-long electrode with a sub-micron tip, fabricated from self-entangled pure CNTs can be used to obtain intracellular and extracellular recordings from vertebrate neurons in vitro and in vivo. This fabrication technology provides a new method for assembling intracellular electrodes from CNTs, affording a promising opportunity to harness nanotechnology for neuroscience applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.