Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23840348›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Assessment of Response to Lithium Maintenance Treatment in Bipolar Disorder: A Consortium on Lithium Genetics (ConLiGen) Report.

Mirko Manchia, Mazda Adli, Nirmala Akula, Raffaella Ardau, Jean-Michel Aubry, Lena Backlund, Claudio Em Banzato, Bernhard T Baune, Frank Bellivier, Susanne Bengesser and 90 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Genome-wide methylation biomarkers and biological aging in patients with bipolar disorder characterized for lithium response.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Swedish bipolar collection (SWEBIC).International journal of bipolar disorders · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Exploring the genetics of lithium response in bipolar disorders.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2024
    Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

100 authors.

Mirko ManchiaDepartment of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Mazda Adli
Nirmala Akula
Raffaella Ardau
Jean-Michel Aubry
Lena Backlund
Claudio Em Banzato
Bernhard T Baune
Frank Bellivier
Susanne Bengesser
Joanna M Biernacka
Clara Brichant-Petitjean
Elise Bui
Cynthia V Calkin
Andrew Tai Ann Cheng
Caterina Chillotti
Sven Cichon
Scott Clark
Piotr M Czerski
Clarissa Dantas
Maria Del Zompo
J Raymond Depaulo
Sevilla D Detera-Wadleigh
Bruno Etain
Peter Falkai
Louise Frisén
Mark A Frye
Jan Fullerton
Sébastien Gard
Julie Garnham
Fernando S Goes
Paul Grof
Oliver Gruber
Ryota Hashimoto
Joanna Hauser
Urs Heilbronner
Rebecca Hoban
Liping Hou
Stéphane Jamain
Jean-Pierre Kahn
Layla Kassem
Tadafumi Kato
John R Kelsoe
Sarah Kittel-Schneider
Sebastian Kliwicki
Po-Hsiu Kuo
Ichiro Kusumi
Gonzalo Laje
Catharina Lavebratt
Marion Leboyer
Susan G Leckband
Carlos A López Jaramillo
Mario Maj
Alain Malafosse
Lina Martinsson
Takuya Masui
Philip B Mitchell
Frank Mondimore
Palmiero Monteleone
Audrey Nallet
Maria Neuner
Tomás Novák
Claire O'Donovan
Urban Osby
Norio Ozaki
Roy H Perlis
Andrea Pfennig
James B Potash
Daniela Reich-Erkelenz
Andreas Reif
Eva Reininghaus
Sara Richardson
Guy A Rouleau
Janusz K Rybakowski
Martin Schalling
Peter R Schofield
Oliver K Schubert
Barbara Schweizer
Florian Seemüller
Maria Grigoroiu-Serbanescu
Giovanni Severino
Lisa R Seymour
Claire Slaney
Jordan W Smoller
Alessio Squassina
Thomas Stamm
Jo Steele
Pavla Stopkova
Sarah K Tighe
Alfonso Tortorella
Gustavo Turecki
Naomi R Wray
Adam Wright
Peter P Zandi
David Zilles
Michael Bauer
Marcella Rietschel
Francis J McMahon
Thomas G Schulze
Martin Alda

Funding

Identification of Genes Involved in Major Mood DisordersZIAMH002843 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI MCMAHON, FRANCIS J · 2009 to 2025
$24.5M
Pharmacogenomics of Mood Stabilizer Response in Bipolar DisorderU01MH092758 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI KELSOE, JOHN R. · 2010 to 2014
$6.2M
Genetic Predictors of Lithium Response in Bipolar DisorderI01CX000363 · VA · VA SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI KELSOE, JOHN R. · 2011 to 2015
–
CIHR 64410CSRD VA I01 CX000363NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH092758
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe assessment of response to lithium maintenance treatment in bipolar disorder (BD) is complicated by variable length of treatment, unpredictable clinical course, and often inconsistent compliance. Prospective and retrospective methods of assessment of lithium response have been proposed in the literature. In this study we report the key phenotypic measures of the "Retrospective Criteria of Long-Term Treatment Response in Research Subjects with Bipolar Disorder" scale currently used in the Consortium on Lithium Genetics (ConLiGen) study. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwenty-nine ConLiGen sites took part in a two-stage case-vignette rating procedure to examine inter-rater agreement [Kappa (κ)] and reliability [intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC)] of lithium response. Annotated first-round vignettes and rating guidelines were circulated to expert research clinicians for training purposes between the two stages. Further, we analyzed the distributional properties of the treatment response scores available for 1,308 patients using mixture modeling.

resultsSubstantial and moderate agreement was shown across sites in the first and second sets of vignettes (κ = 0.66 and κ = 0.54, respectively), without significant improvement from training. However, definition of response using the A score as a quantitative trait and selecting cases with B criteria of 4 or less showed an improvement between the two stages (ICC1 = 0.71 and ICC2 = 0.75, respectively). Mixture modeling of score distribution indicated three subpopulations (full responders, partial responders, non responders).

conclusionsWe identified two definitions of lithium response, one dichotomous and the other continuous, with moderate to substantial inter-rater agreement and reliability. Accurate phenotypic measurement of lithium response is crucial for the ongoing ConLiGen pharmacogenomic study.

Indexed as

Antimanic AgentsBipolar DisorderFemaleHumansInternational CooperationLithium CompoundsMaleModels, TheoreticalPhenotypeReproducibility of ResultsTreatment OutcomeAntimanic AgentsLithium Compounds

Identifiers

PMID23840348
PMCPMC3686769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.