ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2013
Small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a ten-point contemporary review.
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
72 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effect of magnetically guided capsule endoscopy on gastrointestinal transit time and diagnostic yield: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Computer-Aided Bleeding Detection Algorithms for Capsule Endoscopy: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Pooled it
- Comparative Study of MiroCam MC2000 and PillCam SB3 in Detecting Small Bowel Bleeding: A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Crossover Study.Gut and liver · 2025Trial
- First Brazilian expert consensus for video capsule endoscopy and balloon-assisted enteroscopy.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- Effect of Multiple Pharmacological Interventions and Magnetic Control on Capsule Endoscopy Gastrointestinal Transit Time and Diagnostic Yield: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
- Retention of endoscopic capsules in diverticula: Literature review of a capsule endoscopy rarity.Endoscopy international open · 2024Review
- Video Capsule Endoscopy Plays an Important Role in the Management of Crohn's Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A systematic review on diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal diseases by magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy and artificial intelligence.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Octa-nonagenarians can perform video capsule endoscopy safely and with a higher diagnostic yield than 65-79-year-old patients.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2022Article
- Video Capsule Endoscopy in Gastroenterology.Gastroenterology research · 2022Review
- Automated Bowel Polyp Detection Based on Actively Controlled Capsule Endoscopy: Feasibility Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- A Descriptive Analysis of Capsule Endoscopy Events in the FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database.Journal of digestive endoscopy · 2021Article
- Video capsule endoscopy: pushing the boundaries with software technology.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2021Review
- The Efficacy of 4 Liters of Clear Liquids for Small Bowel Preparation Prior to Video Capsule Endoscopy.Clinical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Crohn's disease.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2020Review
- Comparison of Lewis Score and Capsule Endoscopy Crohn's Disease Activity Index in Patients with Crohn's Disease.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2020Article
- Image database, AI and capsule endoscopy; the bets are on.Endoscopy international open · 2020Article
- Artificial intelligence that determines the clinical significance of capsule endoscopy images can increase the efficiency of reading.PloS one · 2020Article
- Small Bowel Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Management-A Narrative Review.Frontiers in surgery · 2019Review
- Optimising the performance and interpretation of small bowel capsule endoscopy.Frontline gastroenterology · 2018Review
12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The introduction of capsule endoscopy (CE) in clinical practice increased the interest for the study of the small-bowel. Consequently, in about 10 years, an impressive quantity of literature on indications, diagnostic yield (DY), safety profile and technical evolution of CE has been published as well as several reviews. At present time, there are 5 small-bowel capsule enteroscopy (SBCE) models in the worldwide market. Head-to-head trials have showed in the great majority of studies comparable results in terms of DY, image quality and completion rate. CE meta-analyses formed the basis of national/international guidelines; these guidelines place CE in a prime position for the diagnostic work-up of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, known and/or suspected Crohn's disease and possible small-bowel neoplasia. A 2-L polyethylene glycol-based purge, administered the day before the procedure, is the most widely practiced preparation regimen. Whether this regimen can be further improved (i.e., by further decreasing its volume, changing the timing of administration, coupling it with prokinetics and/or other factors) or if it can really affect the DY, is still under discussion. Faecal calprotectin has been used in SBCE studies in two settings: in patients taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, to evaluate the type and extent of mucosal damage and, more importantly from a clinical point of view, in patients with known or suspected Crohn's disease for assessment of inflammation activity. Although there is still a lot of debate around the exact reasons of SBCE poor performance in various small-bowel segments, it is worth to remember that the capsule progress is non-steerable, hence more rapid in the proximal than in lower segments of the small-bowel. Capsule aspiration, a relatively unexpected complication, has been reported with increasing frequency. This is probably related with the increase in the mean age of patients undergoing CE. CE video review is a time-consuming procedure. Therefore, several attempts have been made to develop technical software features, in order to make CE video analysis easier and shorter (without jeopardizing its accuracy). Suspected Blood Indicator, QuickView and Fujinon Intelligent Chromo Endoscopy are some of the software tools that have been checked in various clinical studies to date.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.