ArticleJAMA2013
Prevalence and extent of obstructive coronary artery disease among patients undergoing elective coronary catheterization in New York State and Ontario.
Article in JAMA, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of Inpatient Prescribing of First-Generation Antihistamines With Delirium in Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Article
- Hemodynamic Patterns in Interstitial Lung Disease: A Snapshot of Clinical Practice and a Roadmap for Future Trials.Pulmonary circulation · 2025Article
- Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential is associated with increased risk of immune checkpoint inhibitor myocarditis in a prospective study of a cardio-oncology cohort.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2024Article
- Mortality After Multivessel Revascularization in Patients With Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndromes.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- Standardized risk-stratified cardiac assessment and early posttransplant cardiovascular complications in kidney transplant recipients.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Regional Differences in Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in New York State and Ontario.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2023Observational
- Severity of obstructive coronary artery stenosis after pre-eclampsia.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2023Article
- 3D whole-heart noncontrast coronary MR angiography based on compressed SENSE technology: a comparative study of conventional SENSE sequence and coronary computed tomography angiography.Insights into imaging · 2023Article
- Predictors of Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Angiography.Global heart · 2023Article
- A baseline profile of the Queensland Cardiac Record Linkage Cohort (QCard) study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2022Article
- Temporal changes in cardiac SPECT utilization and imaging findings: Where are we going and where have we been?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020Article
- Fractional Flow Reserve Derived from Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Safely Defers Invasive Coronary Angiography in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Profiling Hospital Performance on the Basis of Readmission After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Ontario, Canada.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019Article
- Eligibility, Clinical Outcomes, and Budget Impact of PCSK9 Inhibitor Adoption: The CANHEART PCSK9 Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2018Article
- Comparison of Anatomic and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Alternative Initial Noninvasive Testing Strategies for the Diagnosis of Stable Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2017Article
- Article
- Trade-Offs: Pros and Cons of Being a Doctor and Patient in Canada.Journal of general internal medicine · 2017Article
- Outcomes of Women and Men With Acute Coronary Syndrome Treated With and Without Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2017Article
- Article
- Current trends of major arterial diseases in Korea: based on data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
importancePrior studies have shown that physicians in New York State (New York) perform twice as many cardiac catheterizations per capita as those in Ontario for stable patients. However, the role of patient selection in these findings and their implications for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) are largely unknown.
objectiveTo evaluate the extent of obstructive CAD and to compare the probability of detecting obstructive CAD for patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: An observational study was conducted involving patients without a history of cardiac disease who underwent elective cardiac catheterization between October 1, 2008, and September 30, 2011. Obstructive CAD was defined as diameter stenosis of 50% or more in the left main coronary artery or stenosis of 70% or more in a major epicardial vessel. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Observed rates and predicted probabilities of obstructive CAD. Predicted probabilities were estimated using logistic regression models.
resultsA total of 18,114 patients from New York and 54,933 from Ontario were included. The observed rate of obstructive CAD was significantly lower in New York at 30.4% (95% CI, 29.7%-31.0%) than in Ontario at 44.8% (95% CI, 44.4%-45.3%; P < .001). The percentage of patients with left main or 3-vessel CAD was also significantly lower in New York than in Ontario (7.0% [95% CI, 6.6%-7.3%] vs 13.0% [95% CI, 12.8%-13.3%]; P < .001). In New York, a substantially higher percentage of patients with low predicted probability of obstructive CAD underwent cardiac catheterization; for example, only 19.3% (95% CI, 18.7%-19.9%) of patients undergoing cardiac catheterization in New York had a greater than 50% predicted probability of having obstructive CAD than those in Ontario at 41% (95% CI, 40.6%-41.4%; P < .001). At 30 days, crude mortality for patients undergoing cardiac catheterization was slightly higher in New York at 0.65% (90 of 13,824; 95% CI, 0.51%-0.78%) than in Ontario at 0.38% (153 of 40,794; 95% CI, 0.32%-0.43%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In Ontario compared with New York State, patients undergoing elective cardiac catheterization were significantly more likely to have obstructive CAD. This appears to be related to a higher percentage of patients in New York with low predicted probability of CAD undergoing cardiac catheterization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.