Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23839750›Full record

ArticleJAMA2013

Prevalence and extent of obstructive coronary artery disease among patients undergoing elective coronary catheterization in New York State and Ontario.

Dennis T Ko, Jack V Tu, Peter C Austin, Harindra C Wijeysundera, Zaza Samadashvili, Helen Guo, Warren J Cantor, Edward L Hannan

Abstract readComparative StudyComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Temporal changes in cardiac SPECT utilization and imaging findings: Where are we going and where have we been?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Trade-Offs: Pros and Cons of Being a Doctor and Patient in Canada.Journal of general internal medicine · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dennis T KoInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. dennis.ko@ices.on.ca
Jack V Tu
Peter C Austin
Harindra C Wijeysundera
Zaza Samadashvili
Helen Guo
Warren J Cantor
Edward L Hannan
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAUniversity at Albany, State University of New York · US

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP 102487
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importancePrior studies have shown that physicians in New York State (New York) perform twice as many cardiac catheterizations per capita as those in Ontario for stable patients. However, the role of patient selection in these findings and their implications for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) are largely unknown.

objectiveTo evaluate the extent of obstructive CAD and to compare the probability of detecting obstructive CAD for patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: An observational study was conducted involving patients without a history of cardiac disease who underwent elective cardiac catheterization between October 1, 2008, and September 30, 2011. Obstructive CAD was defined as diameter stenosis of 50% or more in the left main coronary artery or stenosis of 70% or more in a major epicardial vessel. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Observed rates and predicted probabilities of obstructive CAD. Predicted probabilities were estimated using logistic regression models.

resultsA total of 18,114 patients from New York and 54,933 from Ontario were included. The observed rate of obstructive CAD was significantly lower in New York at 30.4% (95% CI, 29.7%-31.0%) than in Ontario at 44.8% (95% CI, 44.4%-45.3%; P < .001). The percentage of patients with left main or 3-vessel CAD was also significantly lower in New York than in Ontario (7.0% [95% CI, 6.6%-7.3%] vs 13.0% [95% CI, 12.8%-13.3%]; P < .001). In New York, a substantially higher percentage of patients with low predicted probability of obstructive CAD underwent cardiac catheterization; for example, only 19.3% (95% CI, 18.7%-19.9%) of patients undergoing cardiac catheterization in New York had a greater than 50% predicted probability of having obstructive CAD than those in Ontario at 41% (95% CI, 40.6%-41.4%; P < .001). At 30 days, crude mortality for patients undergoing cardiac catheterization was slightly higher in New York at 0.65% (90 of 13,824; 95% CI, 0.51%-0.78%) than in Ontario at 0.38% (153 of 40,794; 95% CI, 0.32%-0.43%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In Ontario compared with New York State, patients undergoing elective cardiac catheterization were significantly more likely to have obstructive CAD. This appears to be related to a higher percentage of patients in New York with low predicted probability of CAD undergoing cardiac catheterization.

Indexed as

Coronary AngiographyCoronary Artery BypassFee-for-Service PlansFemaleHumansMaleMedicareMedicare Part CPercutaneous Coronary Intervention

Identifiers

PMID23839750
OpenAlexW1975506640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.