ArticleNeurocritical care2014
Measuring and monitoring ICP in Neurocritical Care: results from a national practice survey.
Article in Neurocritical care, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Altered Neurocritical Care Management of Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Following Changed Positions of the Zero-Reference Points for Intracranial and Arterial Pressure Measurement.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- External Ventricular Drain Column Height Fails to Explain Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage Volumes.Nursing in critical care · 2025Observational
- A Solution to the Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Transducer Placement Conundrum in Neurointensive Care? The Dual Transducer.Neurocritical care · 2024Article
- Intracranial Pressure Monitoring for Acute Brain Injured Patients: When, How, What Should We Monitor.Korean journal of neurotrauma · 2023Review
- Predictive Values for Time from Transducer Stopcock Closure to Accurate Intracranial Pressure Reading.Neurocritical care · 2023Article
- Association of External Ventricular Drain Wean Strategy with Shunt Placement and Length of Stay in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Prospective Multicenter Study.Neurocritical care · 2022Observational
- Assessment of Neurological Status in Patients with Cerebrovascular Diseases through the Nursing Outcome Classification: A Methodological Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2022Article
- Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.Neurologic clinics · 2021Review
- Evidence-Based Management of External Ventricular Drains.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2019Review
- Use of a Doppler-Based Pulsatility Index to Evaluate Cerebral Hemodynamics in Neurocritical Patients After Hemicraniectomy.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2019Article
- External Ventricular Drains After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Is Less More?Neurocritical care · 2018Review
- Management of External Ventricular Drains After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Multi-Institutional Survey.Neurocritical care · 2017Article
- Brainstem Monitoring in the Neurocritical Care Unit: A Rationale for Real-Time, Automated Neurophysiological Monitoring.Neurocritical care · 2017Review
- Brain Multimodality Monitoring: Updated Perspectives.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2016Review
- Intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure monitoring in non-TBI patients: special considerations.Neurocritical care · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe use of intracranial pressure (ICP) monitors is nearly synonymous with Neurocritical Care. Recent studies in nursing literature have report high levels of practice variance associated with ICP monitoring and treatment. There are no recent practice surveys to describe how critical care physicians and nurses who are familiar with ICP management provide care to their patients.
methodsA short survey was developed and disseminated electronically to the members of the Neurocritical Care Society.
resultsThe summary from 241 professionals provides evidence that there is significant practice variation associated with ICP monitoring and management.
conclusionThe results highlight the need to develop standardized approaches to measuring, monitoring, recording, and treating ICP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23839709What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.