Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23839283›Full record

ReviewPsychopharmacology2014

The utility of patient specific induced pluripotent stem cells for the modelling of Autistic Spectrum Disorders.

Graham Cocks, Sarah Curran, Priya Gami, Dafe Uwanogho, Aaron R Jeffries, Annie Kathuria, Walter Lucchesi, Victoria Wood, Rosemary Dixon, Caroline Ogilvie and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychopharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Glaucoma, Stem Cells, and Gene Therapy: Where Are We Now?International journal of stem cells · 2017
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Graham CocksDepartment of Neuroscience, The James Black Centre, King's College London, 125 Coldharbour lane, London, UK.
Sarah Curran
Priya Gami
Dafe Uwanogho
Aaron R Jeffries
Annie Kathuria
Walter Lucchesi
Victoria Wood
Rosemary Dixon
Caroline Ogilvie
Thomas Steckler
Jack Price

Funding

Medical Research Council G1100695
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Until now, models of psychiatric diseases have typically been animal models. Whether they were to be used to further understand the pathophysiology of the disorder, or as drug discovery tools, animal models have been the choice of preference in mimicking psychiatric disorders in an experimental setting. While there have been cellular models, they have generally been lacking in validity. This situation is changing with the advent of patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). In this article, we give a methodological evaluation of the current state of the iPS technology with reference to our own work in generating patient-specific iPSCs for the study of autistic spectrum disorder (ASD). In addition, we will give a broader perspective on the validity of this technology and to what extent it can be expected to complement animal models of ASD in the coming years.

Indexed as

Child Development Disorders, PervasiveInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsModels, BiologicalAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansStem Cell Research

Identifiers

PMID23839283
PMCPMC3932164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.