Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23839219›Full record

ReviewmBio2013

H7N9 avian influenza A virus and the perpetual challenge of potential human pandemicity.

David M Morens, Jeffery K Taubenberger, Anthony S Fauci

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in mBio, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Validation of the wild-type influenza A human challenge model H1N1pdMIST: an A(H1N1)pdm09 dose-finding investigational new drug study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2015
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Unique structural solution from a VNature communications · 2021
    Article
  8. The 1918 Influenza Pandemic and Its Legacy.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David M MorensOffice of the Director, Laboratory of Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. dmorens@niaid.nih.gov
Jeffery K Taubenberger
Anthony S Fauci

Funding

Influenza Viral PathogenesisZIAAI000986 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI TAUBENBERGER, JEFFERY · 2009 to 2025
$30.0M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ABSTRACT The ongoing H7N9 influenza epizootic in China once again presents us questions about the origin of pandemics and how to recognize them in early stages of development. Over the past ~135 years, H7 influenza viruses have neither caused pandemics nor been recognized as having undergone human adaptation. Yet several unusual properties of these viruses, including their poultry epizootic potential, mammalian adaptation, and atypical clinical syndromes in rarely infected humans, suggest that they may be different from other avian influenza viruses, thus questioning any assurance that the likelihood of human adaptation is low. At the same time, the H7N9 epizootic provides an opportunity to learn more about the mammalian/human adaptational capabilities of avian influenza viruses and challenges us to integrate virologic and public health research and surveillance at the animal-human interface.

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalAnimalsBirdsChinaHumansInfluenza A Virus, H7N9 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanInfluenza in BirdsMutationPandemicsRisk AssessmentZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID23839219
PMCPMC3705455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.