ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2013
Chlorthalidone: mechanisms of action and effect on cardiovascular events.
Review in Current hypertension reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative antiplatelet effects of chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Prevention of Heart Failure in Hypertension-Disentangling the Role of Evolving Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Blood Pressure Lowering: The ALLHAT Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019Trial
- The Evolving Role of Chlorthalidone and Hydrochlorothiazide as First-Line Treatments for Hypertensive Patients.Cureus · 2024Review
- Thiazide and other Cl-benzenesulfonamide-bearing clinical drug affinities for human carbonic anhydrases.PloS one · 2021Article
- Is Electrocardiography-Left Ventricular Hypertrophy an Obsolete Marker for Determining Heart Failure Risk With Hypertension?Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019Article
- Compelling therapy of LVH: straight (and not-so-straight) inferences from evidence.Clinical hypertension · 2019Article
- Powerful diuretics: A common denominator in landmark hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus trials.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2018Article
- Pharmacogenetic effects of 'candidate gene complexes' on stroke in the GenHAT study.Pharmacogenetics and genomics · 2014Article
- New insights into carbonic anhydrase inhibition, vasodilation, and treatment of hypertensive-related diseases.Current hypertension reports · 2014Review
- Which thiazide to choose as add-on therapy for hypertension?Integrated blood pressure control · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
How chlorthalidone (CTDN) reduces risk for cardiovascular events (CVEs) can be considered in light of its ability to lower blood pressure (BP) and its non-BP related, pleiotropic effects. The mechanism by which CTDN lowers BP is unclear but may include alterations in whole body regulation and vasodilatory actions on vasculature, possibly mediated via its inhibitory effects on carbonic anhydrase. Additionally, CTDN has potentially beneficial, non-BP related, pleiotropic effects that include improvements in endothelial function, anti-platelet activity, and oxidative status. CTDN reduces pulse wave velocity, predictor of CVEs and a measure of central aortic stiffness associated with endothelial dysfunction. On the other hand, CTDN fosters hypokalemia, hyperglycemia, sympathetic discharge, and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, but these potentially harmful effects do not appear to materially reduce CTDN's ability to prevent CVEs. Further, CTDN reduces and regresses left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), an important BP-dependent predictor of CVEs. Consistent with this finding, CTDN was more effective than amlodipine in reducing congestive heart failure (CHF) in the Anti-hypertensive and Lipid-lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attach Trial (ALLHAT). In reducing CVEs, CTDN was superior to lisinopril in ALLHAT and superior to hydrochlorthiazide in observational cohort analyses and in network analyses of randomized trials. A statistical synthesis of randomized trials suggests that the reduction in cardiovascular risk from CTDN can be explained primarily on the basis of its ability to lower blood pressure rather than its influence upon non-BP related, pleiotropic effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.