Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23838926›Full record

ArticleCellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2013

Visualising and quantifying angiogenesis in metastatic colorectal cancer : A comparison of methods and their predictive value for chemotherapy response.

Torben Frøstrup Hansen, Boye Schnack Nielsen, Anders Jakobsen, Flemming Brandt Sørensen

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Torben Frøstrup HansenDepartment of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark. torben.hansen@rsyd.dk
Boye Schnack Nielsen
Anders Jakobsen
Flemming Brandt Sørensen
Vejle Sygehus · DKBioneer (Denmark) · DKDanish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAngiogenesis plays an important role in tumour growth and dissemination. We have recently shown that blood vessel density, determined by image analysis based on microRNA-126 (miRNA-126) in situ hybridization (ISH) in the primary tumours of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC), is predictive of chemotherapy response. Here, we evaluated whether more general approaches to determine vessel density in primary tumours are equally predictive of chemotherapy response.

methodsThis methodological study was carried out using paraffin embedded tissues from primary tumours of 89 patients with mCRC, who had all been treated with first-line chemotherapy (XELOX). Tissue sections from the deepest invasive tumour front were processed for miRNA-126 ISH and CD34 immunohistochemistry (IHC). Estimates of microvessel density (MVD) were obtained for both miRNA-126 and CD34 by quantitative image analyses (MVDi), vascular area per image (μm²) analyses, and manually counting vessels in vascular hot spots (MVDh). Clinical responses were evaluated according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST).

resultsThe MVDi for miRNA-126 showed a significant correlation with treatment response (p=0.01), with a median value of 2,071 μm² (95% CI, 1,505-3,075 μm²) in the responder group compared to 1,337 μm² (95% CI, 1,038-1,499 μm²) in the non-responder group. This difference translated into a significant difference in progression free survival (p=0.01).

conclusionsThe methodological assessment of MVD and the molecular vessel marker are both important for the prediction of the chemotherapy response in mCRC. Our findings indicate that MVDi for miRNA-126 represents a powerful estimate and may serve as a clinical biomarker superior to MVDh.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, CD34Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCapecitabineColorectal NeoplasmsDeoxycytidineDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFluorouracilHumansImmunohistochemistryIn Situ HybridizationMaleMicroRNAsAntigens, CD34CapecitabineDeoxycytidineFluorouracilMicroRNAsMIRN126 microRNA, humanOxaloacetates

Identifiers

PMID23838926
PMCPMC13012679
OpenAlexW2108909661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.