Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23838017›Full record

ReviewThe ocular surface2013

Corneal gene therapy: basic science and translational perspective.

Rajiv R Mohan, Jason T Rodier, Ajay Sharma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The ocular surface, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Corneal stromal repair and regeneration.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Therapeutic Ultrasound for Topical Corneal Delivery of Macromolecules.Translational vision science & technology · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Gene Therapy in the Anterior Eye Segment.Current gene therapy · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Novel insights into gene therapy in the cornea.Experimental eye research · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Gene editing for corneal disease management.World journal of translational medicine · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rajiv R MohanHarry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital, Columbia, Missouri, USA. mohanr@health.missouri.edu
Jason T Rodier
Ajay Sharma

Funding

Gene Therapy in the CorneaR01EY017294 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI MOHAN, RAJIV RAVINDRA · 2007 to 2018
$4.3M
BLRD VA I01 BX000357NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017294NEI NIH HHS R01EY17294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corneal blindness is the third leading cause of blindness worldwide. Gene therapy is an emerging technology for corneal blindness due to the accessibility and immune-privileged nature of the cornea, ease of vector administration and visual monitoring, and ability to perform frequent noninvasive corneal assessment. Vision restoration by gene therapy is contingent upon vector and mode of therapeutic gene introduction into targeted cells/tissues. Numerous efficacious vectors, delivery techniques, and approaches have evolved in the last decade for developing gene-based interventions for corneal diseases. Maximizing the potential benefits of gene therapy requires efficient and sustained therapeutic gene expression in target cells, low toxicity, and a high safety profile. This review describes the basic science associated with many gene therapy vectors and the present progress of gene therapy carried out for various ocular surface disorders and diseases.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCorneal DiseasesGenetic TherapyHumansadeno-associated virusadenoviruscorneacorneal diseases and dystrophiesgene therapylentivirusnanoparticlesretrovirus

Identifiers

PMID23838017
PMCPMC3708266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.