Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23836927›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of cell biology2013

Big steps toward understanding dynein.

Masahide Kikkawa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of cell biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Motor Proteins and Spermatogenesis.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Scaffold subunits support associated subunit assembly in theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Masahide KikkawaDepartment of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan. mkikkawa@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynein is a microtubule-based molecular motor that is involved in various biological functions, such as axonal transport, mitosis, and cilia/flagella movement. Although dynein was discovered 50 years ago, the progress of dynein research has been slow due to its large size and flexible structure. Recent progress in understanding the force-generating mechanism of dynein using x-ray crystallography, cryo-electron microscopy, and single molecule studies has provided key insight into the structure and mechanism of action of this complex motor protein.

Indexed as

Adenosine TriphosphateAnimalsAxonemeBinding SitesBiomechanical PhenomenaChlamydomonas reinhardtiiCiliaDyneinsFlagellaModels, MolecularMultiprotein ComplexesProtein Structure, TertiaryStructure-Activity RelationshipAdenosine TriphosphateDyneinsMultiprotein Complexes

Identifiers

PMID23836927
PMCPMC3704981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.