Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23836446›Full record

ReviewJournal of applied toxicology : JAT2014

Environmental epigenetics: from novelty to scientific discipline.

Heather H Burris, Andrea A Baccarelli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of applied toxicology : JAT, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Introducing the EpGEpigenomes · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Impact of CAR Agonist Ligand TCPOBOP on Mouse Liver Chromatin Accessibility.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Bi-directional effects of vitamin BScientific reports · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Heather H BurrisDepartment of Neonatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center & Division of Newborn Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Andrea A Baccarelli

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES000002 · NIEHS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI Brent Andrew Coull · 1985 to 2026
$44.6M
BPA, Phthalates & Stress: Mechanisms and Interactions for Childhood ObesityR01ES021357 · NIEHS · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI BACCARELLI, ANDREA, WRIGHT, ROBERT O · 2012 to 2016
$3.3M
Epigenetic Mechanisms of PM-Mediated CVD RiskR01ES020836 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BACCARELLI, ANDREA, HOU, LIFANG · 2012 to 2016
$3.0M
Environment, Fetal Tissue DNA Methylation & BirthweightR01ES020268 · NIEHS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI BACCARELLI, ANDREA, WRIGHT, ROBERT O · 2011 to 2013
$2.5M
The Toxic Environment and the Epigenetics of Fetal GrowthK23ES022242 · NIEHS · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI BURRIS, HEATHER HERSON · 2013 to 2017
$790k
Histone modifications and respiratory effects of traffic particle exposureR21ES020984 · NIEHS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI BACCARELLI, ANDREA, HOU, LIFANG · 2012 to 2013
$455k
Micro-RNA Profiling and Cardiovascular Effects of Traffic Particle ExposureR21ES020010 · NIEHS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI BACCARELLI, ANDREA, HOU, LIFANG · 2011 to 2012
$443k
NIEHS NIH HHS K23ES02224NIEHS NIH HHS K23 ES022242NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES000002NIEHS NIH HHS P30ES00002NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES020268NIEHS NIH HHS R01ES020268NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES020836NIEHS NIH HHS R01ES020836NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES021357NIEHS NIH HHS R01ES021357NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES020010NIEHS NIH HHS R21ES020010NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES020984NIEHS NIH HHS R21ES020984
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetic phenomena have sparked much interest resulting in an exponential increase in scientific investigation in the last two decades. While growing, the field of environmental epigenetics remains small when compared to other areas of epigenetic inquiry such as cancer research. In this paper, our objective is to describe the status of the field of environmental epigenetics and lay out our vision for its future. While environmental epigenetic studies represent fewer than 5% of all epigenetic publications, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences ranks second in proportion of dollars spent on epigenetics of all NIH Institutes. Such investment highlights the hypothesis that epigenetic marks are modified by environmental exposures and the hope that interventions targeted at epigenetic mechanisms may ultimately lead to improved health outcomes. The road to achieve this vision will require: (1) attention to tissue specificity; (2) focused interventional studies; (3) collaboration among cohorts; (4) inclusion of environmental exposures in new large-scale epigenomic studies; and (5) understanding of multiple mechanisms beyond DNA methylation and histone modifications. The investment in environmental epigenetic inquiry will lead to great rewards if we can understand the biology of how phenotype results from environmental stimuli and genetic code. Understanding the epigenetic implications of our actions and exposures may benefit generations to come.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticGene-Environment InteractionDNA MethylationEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental PollutantsGenome, HumanHistonesHumansEnvironmental PollutantsHistonesDNA methylationenvironmental healthEpigeneticshistone modificationsmicroRNA

Identifiers

PMID23836446
PMCPMC3867531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.