Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23836233›Full record

ReviewNature medicine2013

Induced regeneration--the progress and promise of direct reprogramming for heart repair.

Russell C Addis, Jonathan A Epstein

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Direct reprogramming as a route to cardiac repair.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Cardiac progenitor reprogramming for heart regeneration.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2018
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Russell C AddisDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Institute for Regenerative Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. raddis@mail.med.upenn.edu
Jonathan A Epstein

Funding

Expansion of cardiac and hematopoietic progenitors by Wnt and NotchU01HL100405 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI EPSTEIN, JONATHAN A., MORRISEY, EDWARD E · 2009 to 2015
$8.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL100405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regeneration of cardiac tissue has the potential to transform cardiovascular medicine. Recent advances in stem cell biology and direct reprogramming, or transdifferentiation, have produced powerful new tools to advance this goal. In this Review we examine key developments in the generation of new cardiomyocytes in vitro as well as the exciting progress that has been made toward in vivo reprogramming of cardiac tissue. We also address controversies and hurdles that challenge the field.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell TransdifferentiationCellular ReprogrammingHeartHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsModels, BiologicalMyocytes, CardiacRegenerationRegenerative Medicine

Identifiers

PMID23836233
PMCPMC3862032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.