Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23836168›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2013

Fidaxomicin versus conventional antimicrobial therapy in 59 recipients of solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.

Dana S Clutter, Yanina Dubrovskaya, Man Yee Merl, Lewis Teperman, Robert Press, Amar Safdar

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Fidaxomicin for Initial Episode ofOpen forum infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  4. Management ofEClinicalMedicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Real-world effectiveness of fidaxomicin in patients at high risk ofAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2024
    Article
  9. [Recommendations from a panel of experts on the usefulness of fidaxomicin for the treatment of infections caused by Clostridium difficile].Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2019
    Article
  10. Fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of recurrent and severe Clostridium difficile infection in solid organ transplant recipients: A multicenter experience.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The efficacy of fidaxomicin in the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection in a real-world clinical setting: a Spanish multi-centre retrospective cohort.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2017
    Article
  13. Antibacterial Resistance in Patients with Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2017
    Review
  14. Management ofGastroenterology & hepatology · 2016
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Fidaxomicin--the new drug for Clostridium difficile infection.The Indian journal of medical research · 2015
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dana S ClutterNew York University Langone Medical Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Yanina Dubrovskaya
Man Yee Merl
Lewis Teperman
Robert Press
Amar Safdar
NYU Langone Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The feasibility of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin and metronidazole (conventional therapy) was assessed in 59 transplant recipients with 61 episodes of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD). Overall clinical cure was achieved in 86% of episodes, and in 7% of episodes, infection recurred. Fidaxomicin was well tolerated. Clinical cures were not significantly different compared with conventional therapy (67% versus 89%, respectively; P = 0.06). Univariate analysis of predictors for lack of clinical cure included continued use of broad-spectrum systemic antibiotics (P = 0.026) and prior diagnosis of CDAD (95% confidence interval, 1.113 to 19.569; odds ratio, 4.667; P = 0.041). New-onset vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) colonization was not noted after fidaxomicin therapy alone. However, this occurred in 10 of 28 patients (36%) following conventional therapy, and 2 of 3 patients with subsequent bacteremia died.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationOrgan TransplantationAdultAgedAminoglycosidesAnalysis of VarianceAnti-Bacterial AgentsClinical Trials as TopicClostridioides difficileDiarrheaEnterocolitis, PseudomembranousFemaleFidaxomicinHumansMaleMetronidazoleAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsFidaxomicinMetronidazoleVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID23836168
PMCPMC3754298
OpenAlexW2137184904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.