Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23836098›Full record

ArticleCulture, medicine and psychiatry2013

Barriers to implementing the DSM-5 cultural formulation interview: a qualitative study.

Neil Krishan Aggarwal, Andel Veronica Nicasio, Ravi DeSilva, Marit Boiler, Roberto Lewis-Fernández

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Culture, medicine and psychiatry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03499600 (Improving Satisfaction, Engagement and Clinical Outcomes Among Traditionally Underserved Children Through Cultural Formulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03499600 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Improving Satisfaction, Engagement and Clinical Outcomes Among Traditionally Underserved Children Through Cultural Formulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorFlorida International UniversityRan2017 to 2019Enrolled89ConditionsDisruptive BehaviorArmsClinical Assessment and CFI, Clinical Assessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 151 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Beyond theFocus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2021
    Article
  16. Reconsidering Internet Gaming Disorder During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of technology in behavioral science · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Cultural formulation interview: Awareness and attitudes of South African psychiatrists and psychiatry registrars.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2020
    Article
  19. Update on the Cultural Formulation Interview.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Neil Krishan AggarwalDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. aggarwa@nyspi.columbia.edu
Andel Veronica Nicasio
Ravi DeSilva
Marit Boiler
Roberto Lewis-Fernández
New York State Psychiatric InstituteColumbia University · USNew York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute · USRiverside Research Institute · US

Funding

Research Training in Mood and Anxiety Disorders: From Animal Models to PatientsT32MH015144 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI Eduardo David Leonardo · 1985 to 2026
$11.1M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH015144
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Outline for Cultural Formulation (OCF) in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) marked an attempt to apply anthropological concepts within psychiatry. The OCF has been criticized for not providing guidelines to clinicians. The DSM-5 Cultural Issues Subgroup has since converted the OCF into the Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) for use by any clinician with any patient in any clinical setting. This paper presents perceived barriers to CFI implementation in clinical practice reported by patients (n = 32) and clinicians (n = 7) at the New York site within the DSM-5 international field trial. We used an implementation fidelity paradigm to code debriefing interviews after each CFI session through deductive content analysis. The most frequent patient threats were lack of differentiation from other treatments, lack of buy-in, ambiguity of design, over-standardization of the CFI, and severity of illness. The most frequent clinician threats were lack of conceptual relevance between intervention and problem, drift from the format, repetition, severity of patient illness, and lack of clinician buy-in. The Subgroup has revised the CFI based on these barriers for final publication in DSM-5. Our findings expand knowledge on the cultural formulation by reporting the CFI's reception among patients and clinicians.

Indexed as

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersMental DisordersAdultAgedAnthropology, CulturalAnthropology, MedicalEthnopsychologyFemaleHumansInterview, PsychologicalMaleMiddle AgedNew YorkQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID23836098
PMCPMC4299818
OpenAlexW1981427618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.