Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23836088›Full record

ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2013

Opioid induced bowel disease: a twenty-first century physicians' dilemma. Considering pathophysiology and treatment strategies.

Ankush Sharma, M Mazen Jamal

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Opioid misuse in gastroenterology and non-opioid management of abdominal pain.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Epigenetics in the perioperative period.British journal of pharmacology · 2015
    Review
  11. The narcotic bowel syndrome: a recent update.American journal of gastroenterology supplements (Print) · 2014
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ankush SharmaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of California Irvine Medical Center and Medical School, Orange, CA, USA, ankushs@uci.edu
M Mazen Jamal
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of cancer-associated pain as well as chronic non-cancer-related pain (CNCP) is an increasingly relevant topic in medicine. However, it has long been recognized that opiates can adversely affect many organ systems, most notably the gastrointestinal system. These are referred to as the spectrum of "opioid-induced bowel dysfunction" (OBD) or what we will refer to as "opioid-induced bowel disease" (OIBD) which include constipation, nausea, vomiting, delayed gastric emptying, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), and a newer entity known as narcotic bowel syndrome (NBS). Opioid analgesics are increasingly being used for the treatment of cancer pain, non-cancer-associated pain, and postoperative pain. As we achieve our goals towards pain control, we need to be cognizant of and competent in how to prevent and treat OIBD. The basis is due in part to µ-receptor activation, decreasing the peristaltic contraction and leading to sequelae of OIBD. Treatment beyond lifestyle interventional strategy will employ laxatives and stool softeners. However, studies performed while patients were already using laxativies and stool softeners have elicited the necessity of peripherally acting agents such as methylnaltrexone (MNTX) and alvimopan. Patients responded dramatically to both medications, but these studies were limited to patients that were deemed to have advanced illness. Lubiprostone, while different in its mechanism of action from MNTX and alvimopan, has proven effective and should be considered for use in OIBD. Further investigational research will promulgate more information and allow for better and more efficient treatment options for OIBD.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidConstipationHumansIntestinal DiseasesLaxativesNarcotic AntagonistsAnalgesics, OpioidLaxativesNarcotic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID23836088
OpenAlexW1579775806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.