ArticleMaternal and child health journal2014
Factors associated with human immunodeficiency virus screening of women during pregnancy, labor and delivery, United States, 2005-2006.
Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The evidence base for US joint commission hospital accreditation standards: cross sectional study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2022Article
- Estimates of Prenatal HIV, Hepatitis B Virus, and Hepatitis C Virus Testing Among Pregnant People Enrolled in Wisconsin Medicaid, 2011-2015.Maternal and child health journal · 2020Article
- HIV Screening During Pregnancy in a U.S. HIV Epicenter.Infectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology · 2020Article
- Hepatitis C Screening in an Underserved U.S. Cohort of Reproductive Age Women.Hepatology communications · 2019Article
- HIV Testing Among Heterosexual Hispanic Women in South Florida.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2019Article
- Reconsidering the Number of Women With HIV Infection Who Give Birth Annually in the United States.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974) · 2018Article
- Characteristics associated with lack of HIV testing during pregnancy and delivery in 36 U.S. states, 2004-2013.International journal of STD & AIDS · 2018Article
- Estimated Perinatal HIV Infection Among Infants Born in the United States, 2002-2013.JAMA pediatrics · 2017Article
- HIV testing during pregnancy among women with a recent live birth-Seven US States, 2016-2019.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to estimate prenatal human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screening rates prior to and on admission to labor and delivery (L&D) and to examine factors associated with HIV screening, including hospital policies, with a comparison of HIV and hepatitis B prenatal screening practices and hospital policies. In March 2006, a survey of hospitals (n = 190) and review of paired maternal and infant medical records (n = 4,762) were conducted in 50 US states, DC, and Puerto Rico. Data from the survey and medical record review were analyzed using SAS software v9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). HIV testing before delivery occurred among 3,438 women (73.9%); African American and Hispanic women were more likely to be tested than white women [aOR 2.22, 95% CI (1.6-3.1) and aOR 1.55, 95% CI (1.1-2.2), respectively]. Among women without previous HIV testing, 138 (16.6%) were tested after admission to labor and delivery. Policies to test women with undocumented HIV status in at delivery were present in 65 (36.3%) hospitals. HIV testing after admission to L&D was more likely in hospitals with policies to test women with undocumented HIV status [aOR 5.91, 95% CI (2.0-17.8)]. Overall, policies and screening practices for HIV were consistently less prevalent than those for hepatitis B. Many women are not being routinely screened for HIV before or at delivery. Women with unknown HIV status were more likely to be tested in L&D in hospitals with testing policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23836013What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.