Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23835942›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2013

The Role of Modeling and Simulation in Development and Registration of Medicinal Products: Output From the EFPIA/EMA Modeling and Simulation Workshop.

E Manolis, S Rohou, R Hemmings, T Salmonson, M Karlsson, P A Milligan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
19.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The case for AI-driven cancer clinical trials - The efficacy arm in silico.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Methods to Develop anFrontiers in psychiatry · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Progress and Opportunities to Advance Clinical Cancer Therapeutics Using Tumor Dynamic Models.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Frontiers in neurology · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

E ManolisEuropean Medicines Agency (EMA), London, UK.
S Rohou
R Hemmings
T Salmonson
M Karlsson
P A Milligan
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBMedical Products Agency · SEPfizer (United Kingdom) · GBUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) hosted a workshop on modeling and simulation (M&S).(1) Representatives from industry, academia, and regulatory agencies from Europe and beyond discussed the role of M&S in the development and registration of medicinal products within plenary and breakout sessions (BOS). This manuscript summarizes the plenary discussion (Table 1) focusing on the European perspective. Deliverables from each BOS are included in separate papers.CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology (2013) 2, e31; doi:10.1038/psp.2013.7; advance online publication 27 February 2013.

Identifiers

PMID23835942
PMCPMC3600760
OpenAlexW2059056324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.