Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23835940›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2013

Modeling and simulation in clinical pharmacology and dose finding.

A Staab, E Rook, M Maliepaard, L Aarons, C Benson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. How to Handle Delayed or Missed Doses: A Population Pharmacokinetic Perspective.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Regulatory modeling and simulation moves into the next gear in europe.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A StaabTranslational Medicine, Pharmacometrics, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach, Germany.
E Rook
M Maliepaard
L Aarons
C Benson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The breakout session 2 of the European Medicines Agency/European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations Modeling and Simulation (M&S) workshop focused on two topics: when and how M&S should be used and would be accepted by the authorities for the dose-regimen selection; and when and how M&S can be applied to register a dosing regimen without the need for a specific study. Each topic was introduced by an industry and regulatory perspective, followed by case examples for illustration (Table 1).CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology (2013) 2, e29; doi:10.1038/psp.2013.5; advance online publication 27 February 2013.

Identifiers

PMID23835940
PMCPMC3600758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.