ArticleRheumatology international2013
Clinical features and independent predictors in the further development of rheumatoid arthritis in undifferentiated arthritis.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microbiome-miRNA interactions in the progress from undifferentiated arthritis to rheumatoid arthritis: evidence, hypotheses, and opportunities.Rheumatology international · 2021Review
- Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody predicts the development of rheumatoid arthritis in patients with undifferentiated arthritis.Chinese medical journal · 2019Observational
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the prognosis of undifferentiated arthritis (UA) and to estimate the putative predictors contributing to predict the development of UA into rheumatoid arthritis (RA); thus, it could improve appropriate medical intervention. A retrospective cohort study of 218 patients with an initial diagnosis of UA and 2-year follow-up monitoring was carried out. The baseline information including demographic variables, clinical features, and laboratory data was collected. A logistic regression model was used for the statistical analysis. After 2 years of follow-up, 20.18% of UA patients evolved into RA, but 33.03% remained undifferentiated. Meanwhile, 25.23% went into remission, and 21.56% developed into other connective tissue diseases. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that the titer of antibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP), tender joint count and duration of morning stiffness were independent predictors for the development of RA. The area under the curve (AUC) of duration of morning stiffness (0.81) was largest, followed by tender joint count (0.74). The AUC of anti-CCP antibodies (0.68) was higher than that of rheumatoid factor of IgM type (IgM-RF) (0.60), and the combination of these two antibodies was significantly higher than each alone (P < 0.001). In conclusion, UA patients had variable clinical outcomes and prognosis. Only the titer of anti-CCP antibodies, tender joint count, and duration of morning stiffness, instead of IgM-RF, could predict the development of RA. Although the anti-CCP antibody was better than the IgM-RF in predicting RA, a combined detection of them still improved the diagnostic performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.