Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23835699›Full record

ArticleIntegrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro2013

Complex chemoattractive and chemorepellent Kit signals revealed by direct imaging of murine mast cells in microfluidic gradient chambers.

Amir Shamloo, Milan Manchandia, Meghaan Ferreira, Maheswaran Mani, Christopher Nguyen, Thomas Jahn, Kenneth Weinberg, Sarah Heilshorn

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Microfluidics: reframing biological enquiry.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2015
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amir ShamlooDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-4045, USA.
Milan Manchandia
Meghaan Ferreira
Maheswaran Mani
Christopher Nguyen
Thomas Jahn
Kenneth Weinberg
Sarah Heilshorn
Stanford University · US

Funding

TUMOR SPECIFIC CYTOTOXIC T-LYMPHOCYTES IN BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATIONP01CA049605 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI David B. Miklos · 1989 to 2026
$73.3M
Engineering 3D in vitro niches to reveal fundamentals of cellular biomechanicsDP2OD006477 · OD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HEILSHORN, SARAH C · 2009 to 2009
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS CA049605NCI NIH HHS P01 CA049605NIH HHS DP2 OD006477NIH HHS DP2-OD006477-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Besides its cooperating effects on stem cell proliferation and survival, Kit ligand (KL) is a potent chemotactic protein. While transwell assays permit studies of the frequency of migrating cells, the lack of direct visualization precludes dynamic chemotaxis studies. In response, we utilize microfluidic chambers that enable direct observation of murine bone marrow-derived mast cells (BMMC) within stable KL gradients. Using this system, individual Kit+ BMMC were quantitatively analyzed for migration speed and directionality during KL-induced chemotaxis. Our results indicated a minimum activating threshold of ~3 ng ml(-1) for chemoattraction. Analysis of cells at KL concentrations below 3 ng ml(-1) revealed a paradoxical chemorepulsion, which has not been described previously. Unlike chemoattraction, which occurred continuously after an initial time lag, chemorepulsion occurred only during the first 90 minutes of observation. Both chemoattraction and chemorepulsion required the action of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR), as treatment with pertussis toxin abrogated directed migration. These results differ from previous studies of GPCR-mediated chemotaxis, where chemorepulsion occurred at high ligand concentrations. These data indicate that Kit-mediated chemotaxis is more complex than previously understood, with the involvement of GPCRs in addition to the Kit receptor tyrosine kinase and the presence of both chemoattractive and chemorepellent phases.

Indexed as

Microfluidic Analytical TechniquesAnimalsBone Marrow CellsCell Culture TechniquesCells, CulturedChemotaxisGTP-Binding ProteinsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMast CellsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMicrofluidicsPertussis ToxinReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSignal TransductionStem Cell FactorGTP-Binding ProteinsPertussis ToxinReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledStem Cell Factor

Identifiers

PMID23835699
PMCPMC3973540
OpenAlexW2035928788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.