ReviewRadiation oncology (London, England)2013
Second primary cancers after radiation for prostate cancer: a review of data from planning studies.
Review in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk of secondary rectal cancer and colon cancer after radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2018Pooled it
- Factors Associated With Male Breast Cancer Incidence Among Prostate Cancer Survivors: Real World Evidence From Veterans Affairs National Prostate Cancer Data Core.The Prostate · 2026Article
- Article
- Low-dose-rate brachytherapy and long-term treatment outcomes in patients younger than 60 years of age.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2024Article
- Proton therapy for prostate cancer: current state and future perspectives.The British journal of radiology · 2022Review
- Review
- Urological complications after radiation therapy-nothing ventured, nothing gained: a Narrative Review.Translational cancer research · 2021Review
- Combination of intensity modulated radiotherapy followed treatment with p38 MAPK activation inhibitor inhibits the proliferation of MCF-7 breast cancer cells.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2018Article
- Cancer risk assessment in modern radiotherapy workflow with medical big data.Cancer management and research · 2018Review
- Incidence of bladder cancer after radiation for prostate cancer as a function of time and radiation modality.World journal of urology · 2017Article
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Acute Myeloid Leukemia After Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: A Population-Based Study.The Prostate · 2017Article
- Risk of second cancer following radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a population-based analysis.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2017Article
- The Prognostic Value of Previous Irradiation on Survival of Bladder Cancer Patients.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2015Article
- Mutations of the human interferon alpha-2b (hIFNα-2b) gene in cancer patients receiving radiotherapy.American journal of cancer research · 2015Article
- Recommendations for the referral of patients for proton-beam therapy, an Alberta Health Services report: a model for Canada?Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2014Article
- Intensity modulated radiotherapy induces pro-inflammatory and pro-survival responses in prostate cancer patients.International journal of oncology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A review of planning studies was undertaken to evaluate estimated risks of radiation induced second primary cancers (RISPC) associated with different prostate radiotherapy techniques for localised prostate cancer. A total of 83 publications were identified which employed a variety of methods to estimate RISPC risk. Of these, the 16 planning studies which specifically addressed absolute or relative second cancer risk using dose-response models were selected for inclusion within this review. There are uncertainties and limitations related to all the different methods for estimating RISPC risk. Whether or not dose models include the effects of the primary radiation beam, as well as out-of-field regions, influences estimated risks. Regarding the impact of IMRT compared to 3D-CRT, at equivalent energies, several studies suggest an increase in risk related to increased leakage contributing to out-of-field RISPC risk, although in absolute terms this increase in risk may be very small. IMRT also results in increased low dose normal tissue irradiation, but the extent to which this has been estimated to contribute to RISPC risk is variable, and may also be very small. IMRT is often delivered using 6MV photons while conventional radiotherapy often requires higher energies to achieve adequate tissue penetration, and so comparisons between IMRT and older techniques should not be restricted to equivalent energies. Proton and brachytherapy planning studies suggest very low RISPC risks associated with these techniques. Until there is sufficient clinical evidence regarding RISPC risks associated with modern irradiation techniques, the data produced from planning studies is relevant when considering which patients to irradiate, and which technique to employ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.