Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23834999›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2013

Use of mobile devices to answer online surveys: implications for research.

John A Cunningham, Clayton Neighbors, Nicolas Bertholet, Christian S Hendershot

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01521078 (Randomized Controlled Trial of a Brief Personalized Feedback Intervention in University Students), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01521078 nacompletednot on this map

Randomized Controlled Trial of a Brief Personalized Feedback Intervention in University Students

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthRan2012 to 2012Enrolled425ConditionsRisky Alcohol ConsumptionArmsCheck Your Drinking University version
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John A CunninghamCentre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. john.cunningham@anu.edu.au
Clayton Neighbors
Nicolas Bertholet
Christian S Hendershot

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a growing use of mobile devices to access the Internet. We examined whether participants who used a mobile device to access a brief online survey were quicker to respond to the survey but also, less likely to complete it than participants using a traditional web browser.

findingsUsing data from a recently completed online intervention trial, we found that participants using mobile devices were quicker to access the survey but less likely to complete it compared to participants using a traditional web browser. More concerning, mobile device users were also less likely to respond to a request to complete a six week follow-up survey compared to those using traditional web browsers.

conclusionsWith roughly a third of participants using mobile devices to answer an online survey in this study, the impact of mobile device usage on survey completion rates is a concern.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01521078.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneMicrocomputersData CollectionInternet

Identifiers

PMID23834999
PMCPMC3708744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.