Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23834340›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2013

Rapid forward-in-time simulation at the chromosome and genome level.

Andre J Aberer, Alexandros Stamatakis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andre J AbererThe Exelixis Lab, Scientific Computing Group, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies, Schloss-Wolfsbrunnenweg 35, Heidelberg D-69118, Germany. andre.aberer@h-its.org
Alexandros Stamatakis
Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn population genetics, simulation is a fundamental tool for analyzing how basic evolutionary forces such as natural selection, recombination, and mutation shape the genetic landscape of a population. Forward simulation represents the most powerful, but, at the same time, most compute-intensive approach for simulating the genetic material of a population.

resultsWe introduce AnA-FiTS, a highly optimized forward simulation software, that is up to two orders of magnitude faster than current state-of-the-art software. In addition, we present a novel algorithm that further improves runtimes by up to an additional order of magnitude, for simulations where a fraction of the mutations is neutral (e.g., only 10% of mutations have an effect on fitness). Apart from simulated sequences, our tool also generates a graph structure that depicts the complete observable history of neutral mutations.

conclusionsThe substantial performance improvements allow for conducting forward simulations at the chromosome and genome level. The graph structure generated by our algorithm can give rise to novel approaches for visualizing and analyzing the output of forward simulations.

Indexed as

Chromosome BreakpointsComputer SimulationDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedGenetics, PopulationGenomeMutationAlgorithmsBase SequenceBiological EvolutionRecombination, GeneticSelection, GeneticSoftwareTime

Identifiers

PMID23834340
PMCPMC3718712
OpenAlexW2151335815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.