Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23834298›Full record

ArticleAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2013

Maintaining stable symptom control in inflammatory bowel disease: a retrospective analysis of adherence, medication switches and the risk of relapse.

A Robinson, M Hankins, G Wiseman, M Jones

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Beliefs About Medicines and Adherence to Treatment in Turkish Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Adherence in ulcerative colitis: an overview.Patient preference and adherence · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Mesalazine preparations for the treatment of ulcerative colitis: Are all created equal?World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2015
    Review
  15. Current approaches to the management of new-onset ulcerative colitis.Clinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2014
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A RobinsonSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK. andrew.robinson@srft.nhs.uk
M Hankins
G Wiseman
M Jones
Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaintenance therapy with 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) is a key strategy for preventing relapse in many patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Factors which disrupt 5-ASA delivery, such as non-adherence and 5-ASA switches, may destabilise symptom control.

aimTo investigate the impact of non-adherence and medication switches on stable symptom control in UK patients with IBD.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using a UK dispensing database. Adherence was analysed in randomised matched samples for each of the six leading oral mesalazine formulations, measured by medication possession ratio (MPR); MPR ≥80% was classified as adherent. Relationships among adherence, switch and relapse were analysed over 18 months in patients receiving continuous mesalazine therapy throughout a 6-month baseline period (primary subgroup analysis). Relapses of active ulcerative colitis were identified using a doubling of MPR as a proxy.

resultsOnly 39% of patients in the matched samples (n = 1200) were classed as adherent. No significant differences in adherence were observed among mesalazine formulations. In the primary subgroup analysis (n = 568), non-adherent patients had a significantly greater risk of relapse than adherent patients (RR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.08-1.94; P = 0.014). Among adherent patients (n = 276), those who switched had a 3.5-fold greater risk of relapse than those who did not switch (95% CI = 1.16-10.62; P = 0.008).

conclusionsBoth non-adherence and mesalazine switches in adherent patients were associated with significant increases in the risk of relapse, suggesting that disruption of mesalazine maintenance therapy may destabilise symptom control. These findings provide evidence to advocate caution when considering mesalazine switches for stable patients.

Indexed as

Drug SubstitutionMedication AdherenceAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesMaleMesalamineMiddle AgedRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalMesalamine

Identifiers

PMID23834298
PMCPMC3840705
OpenAlexW2063462312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.