Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23833076›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2013

Renal outcomes associated with invasive versus conservative management of acute coronary syndrome: propensity matched cohort study.

Matthew T James, Marcello Tonelli, William A Ghali, Merril L Knudtson, Peter Faris, Braden J Manns, Neesh Pannu, P Diane Galbraith, Brenda R Hemmelgarn, Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease and Alberta Kidney Disease Network Investigators

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew T JamesDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Centre, 1403 29th St NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 2T9, Canada. mjames@ucalgary.ca
Marcello Tonelli
William A Ghali
Merril L Knudtson
Peter Faris
Braden J Manns
Neesh Pannu
P Diane Galbraith
Brenda R Hemmelgarn
Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease and Alberta Kidney Disease Network Investigators
University of Calgary · CAUniversity of Alberta · CAFoothills Medical Centre · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine the association of early invasive management of acute coronary syndrome with adverse renal outcomes and survival, and to determine whether the risks or benefits of early invasive management differ in people with pre-existing chronic kidney disease.

designPropensity score matched cohort study.

settingAcute care hospitals in Alberta, Canada, 2004-09.

participants10,516 adults with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome.

interventionsParticipants were stratified by baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate and matched 1:1 on their propensity score for early invasive management (coronary catheterisation within two days of hospital admission).

main outcome measuresRisks of acute kidney injury, kidney injury requiring dialysis, progression to end stage renal disease, and all cause mortality were compared between those who received early invasive treatment versus conservative treatment.

resultsOf 10,516 included participants, 4276 (40.7%) received early invasive management. After using propensity score methods to assemble a matched cohort of conservative management participants with characteristics similar to those who received early invasive management (n=6768), early invasive management was associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury (10.3% v 8.7%, risk ratio 1.18, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.36; P=0.019), but no difference in the risk of acute kidney injury requiring dialysis (0.4% v 0.3%, 1.20, 0.52 to 2.78; P=0.670). Over a median follow-up of 2.5 years, the risk of progression to end stage renal disease did not differ between the groups (0.3 v 0.4 events per 100 person years, hazard ratio 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.55 to 1.49; P=0.712); however, early invasive management was associated with reduced long term mortality (2.4 v 3.4 events per 100 person years, 0.69, 0.58 to 0.82; P<0.001). These associations were consistent among people with pre-existing reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate and with alternate definitions for early invasive management.

conclusionsCompared with conservative management, early invasive management of acute coronary syndrome is associated with a small increase in risk of acute kidney injury but not dialysis or long term progression to end stage renal disease.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeAcute Kidney InjuryAgedCardiac CatheterizationFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHumansKidney DiseasesKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID23833076
PMCPMC3702156
OpenAlexW2020695674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.