Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23832398›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2013

Tangled in the breast cancer web: an evaluation of the usage of web-based information resources by breast cancer patients.

Sonia Kim Anh Nguyen, Paris-Ann Ingledew

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Challenges in Obtaining and Seeking Information Among Breast Cancer Survivors in an Asian Country: a Qualitative Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Assessment of Lung Cancer YouTube Videos for Patient Education.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Viral Disease Goes Viral: Characterizing How Cancer Patients Use Internet Resources for COVID-19 Information.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Analysis of Internet-Based Search Patterns Utilized by Glioma Patients as Information Source.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  12. How Internet Websites Portray Herbal Vitality Products ContainingInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Digesting the Contents: an Analysis of Online Colorectal Cancer Education Websites.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  15. Caught in the net: Characterizing how testicular cancer patients use the internet as an information source.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Websites, Websites Everywhere: How Thyroid Cancer Patients Use the Internet.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Article
  19. An exploratory study in breast cancer of factors involved in the use and communication with health professionals of Internet information.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  20. Breast Cancer Patients' Perceptions of Adjuvant Radiotherapy: an Assessment of Pre-Treatment Knowledge and Informational Needs.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sonia Kim Anh NguyenBritish Columbia Cancer Agency-Fraser Valley Centre, Surrey, BC, Canada.
Paris-Ann Ingledew

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study describes Internet use by breast cancer patients highlighting search patterns and examining the impact of web-based information on the clinical encounter. From September 2011 to January 2012, breast cancer patients at a cancer center completed a survey. Answers were closed and open-ended. Eighty-one patients were approached and 56 completed the survey. Forty-five (80 %) respondents used the Internet and 32 (71 %) searched for breast cancer information. All used Google as their principal search engine. To evaluate quality, 47 % referred to author credentials and 41 % examined references. Most sought information with respect to treatment or prognosis. Eighty percent felt that the information increased their knowledge and influenced treatment decision making for 53 %. This study highlights search patterns and factors used by breast cancer patients in seeking web-based information. Physicians must appreciate that patients use the Internet and address discrepancies between information sought and that which is available.

Indexed as

Decision MakingMedical InformaticsPatient Education as TopicAgedBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansInternetMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.