ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2013
Familial haplotyping and embryo analysis for Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) using DNA microarrays: a proof of principle study.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preimplantation genetic testing as a means of preventing hereditary congenital myasthenic syndrome caused by RAPSN.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2024Article
- The clinical application of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for X-linked retinitis pigmentosa.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2019Article
- Next-Generation Sequencing in Oncology: Genetic Diagnosis, Risk Prediction and Cancer Classification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017Review
- The clinical application of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for the patient affected by congenital contractural arachnodactyly and spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2016Article
- Concurrent whole-genome haplotyping and copy-number profiling of single cells.American journal of human genetics · 2015Article
- Single cell genomics: advances and future perspectives.PLoS genetics · 2014Review
- Preimplantation genetic diagnosis guided by single-cell genomics.Genome medicine · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDevelopment of PGD assays for molecular disorders is based on analysis of a familial mutation together with linked polymorphic STR markers; a process which is lengthy and requires the identification of multiple informative markers prior to PGD analysis. On the other hand, whole genome amplification (WGA), in conjunction with microarray platforms, allows the use of a universal assay for the analysis of a very large number of SNP markers at once. The aim of this study was to test high throughput pre-PGD familial haplotyping for in-case blastomere analysis in order to eliminate time-consuming pre-case preparations for each family.
methodsA PGD cycle was performed for a couple with paternal Charcot Marie Tooth 1A (CMT1A) using a classic multiplex nested PCR approach. Mutant embryos from the case were blindly reanalyzed, as single or multi-cell biopsies, using a multiple displacement amplification-based WGA protocol and microarray SNP analysis. In parallel, relevant genomic DNA samples from the family were also analyzed by SNP microarray.
resultsAfter applying a 'unique informative allele' selection algorithm to the data, this array-based assay reconfirmed the initial diagnosis in all samples.
conclusionsWe describe a PGD method that is both accurate and feasible during the time-frame required for embryo transfer. This strategy greatly reduces the time for pre-case haplotype preparation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.