Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23831965›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2013

GluN2B in corticostriatal circuits governs choice learning and choice shifting.

Jonathan L Brigman, Rachel A Daut, Tara Wright, Ozge Gunduz-Cinar, Carolyn Graybeal, Margaret I Davis, Zhihong Jiang, Lisa M Saksida, Seiichiro Jinde, Matthew Pease and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed, 169 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jonathan L BrigmanLaboratory of Behavioral and Genomic Neuroscience, National Institute on Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse (NIAAA), US National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Rachel A Daut
Tara Wright
Ozge Gunduz-Cinar
Carolyn Graybeal
Margaret I Davis
Zhihong Jiang
Lisa M Saksida
Seiichiro Jinde
Matthew Pease
Timothy J Bussey
David M Lovinger
Kazu Nakazawa
Andrew Holmes
National Institutes of Health · USNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism · USNational Institute of Mental Health · USWellcome Trust · GB

Funding

Mouse models of stress disorders and addictionZIAAA000411 · NIAAA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM · PI HOLMES, ANDREW · 2009 to 2025
$37.7M
Corticostriatal mechanisms of action learning and habit formationZIAAA000416 · NIAAA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM · PI LOVINGER, DAVID M · 2009 to 2025
$25.2M
Forebrain GABAergic cell-selective genetic manipulation in miceZIAMH002895 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI NAKAZAWA, KAZUTOSHI · 2009 to 2013
$6.4M
Corticostriatal networks and NMDAR mediation of habitual and flexible actionK22AA020303 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI BRIGMAN, JONATHAN L · 2011 to 2013
$486k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA AA000411Medical Research Council G0001354NIAAA NIH HHS K22 AA020303Wellcome Trust 089703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A choice that reliably produces a preferred outcome can be automated to liberate cognitive resources for other tasks. Should an outcome become less desirable, behavior must adapt in parallel or it becomes perseverative. Corticostriatal systems are known to mediate choice learning and flexibility, but the molecular mechanisms of these processes are not well understood. We integrated mouse behavioral, immunocytochemical, in vivo electrophysiological, genetic and pharmacological approaches to study choice. We found that the dorsal striatum (DS) was increasingly activated with choice learning, whereas reversal of learned choice engaged prefrontal regions. In vivo, DS neurons showed activity associated with reward anticipation and receipt that emerged with learning and relearning. Corticostriatal or striatal deletion of Grin2b (encoding the NMDA-type glutamate receptor subunit GluN2B) or DS-restricted GluN2B antagonism impaired choice learning, whereas cortical Grin2b deletion or OFC GluN2B antagonism impaired shifting. Our convergent data demonstrate how corticostriatal GluN2B circuits govern the ability to learn and shift choice behavior.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAnimalsAnticipation, PsychologicalChoice BehaviorConditioning, OperantCorpus StriatumDecision MakingDiscrimination LearningExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsGene DeletionMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicNerve NetNerve Tissue ProteinsExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsNerve Tissue ProteinsNR2B NMDA receptorPhenolsPiperidinesReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateRo 25-6981

Identifiers

PMID23831965
PMCPMC3725191
OpenAlexW2032201144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.