ReviewCritical care clinics2013
Biowarfare and bioterrorism.
Review in Critical care clinics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Triage Algorithms for Mass-Casualty Bioterrorism: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Pooled it
- From Aerosol to Signal: Advances in Biosensor Technologies for Airborne Biothreat Detection.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Guardians at the Gate: Optimization of Small Molecule Entry Inhibitors of Ebola and Marburg Viruses.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- N2A, MCF7, and HepG2 Cells Support Intracellular Replication ofmicroPublication biology · 2025Article
- Large Anthrax Outbreak in a New Locality in Croatia, 2022.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Health Care Providers' Perceptions of Quality, Acceptance, and Satisfaction With Telebehavioral Health Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Survey-Based Study.JMIR mental health · 2020Article
- Deliberate release: Plague - A review.Journal of biosafety and biosecurity · 2020Review
- Biodefense Implications of New-World Hantaviruses.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Biothreat Agents and Emerging Infectious Disease in the Emergency Department.Emergency medicine clinics of North America · 2018Review
- Investigation of an isolated case of human Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever in Central Uganda, 2015.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2018Article
- Preparing for biological threats: Addressing the needs of pregnant women.Birth defects research · 2017Review
- Comparison of radii sets, entropy, QM methods, and sampling on MM-PBSA, MM-GBSA, and QM/MM-GBSA ligand binding energies of F. tularensis enoyl-ACP reductase (FabI).Journal of computational chemistry · 2015Article
- Dengue Vaccines: A Perspective from the Point of View of Intellectual Property.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bioterrorism is not only a reality of the times in which we live but bioweapons have been used for centuries. Critical care physicians play a major role in the recognition of and response to a bioterrorism attack. Critical care clinicians must be familiar with the diagnosis and management of the most likely bioterrorism agents, and also be adequately prepared to manage a mass casualty situation. This article reviews the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of the most likely agents of biowarfare and bioterrorism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.