ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2013
Indentation of poroviscoelastic vocal fold tissue using an atomic force microscope.
Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deciphering cartilage neuro-immune interactions and innervation profile through 3D engineered osteoarthritic micropathophysiological system.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Stem cell therapy for vocal fold regeneration after scarring: a review of experimental approaches.Stem cell research & therapy · 2022Review
- Characterization of intrauterine growth, proliferation and biomechanical properties of the murine larynx.PloS one · 2021Article
- Multimodal virtual histology of rabbit vocal folds by nonlinear microscopy and nano computed tomography.Biomedical optics express · 2019Article
- Permeability mapping of gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels.Acta biomaterialia · 2018Article
- Investigation of fullerenol-induced changes in poroelasticity of human hepatocellular carcinoma by AFM-based creep tests.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2018Article
- Tissue engineering-based therapeutic strategies for vocal fold repair and regeneration.Biomaterials · 2016Review
- Theoretical Considerations and a Mathematical Model for the Analysis of the Biomechanical Response of Human Keratinized Oral Mucosa.Frontiers in physiology · 2016Article
- Microstructural and mechanical characterization of scarred vocal folds.Journal of biomechanics · 2015Article
- Determination of the elastic properties of rabbit vocal fold tissue using uniaxial tensile testing and a tailored finite element model.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2014Article
- An in vivo study of composite microgels based on hyaluronic acid and gelatin for the reconstruction of surgically injured rat vocal folds.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2014Article
- Nanoscale viscoelasticity of extracellular matrix proteins in soft tissues: A multiscale approach.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The elastic properties of the vocal folds (VFs) vary as a function of depth relative to the epithelial surface. The poroelastic anisotropic properties of porcine VFs, at various depths, were measured using atomic force microscopy (AFM)-based indentation. The minimum tip diameter to effectively capture the local properties was found to be 25µm, based on nonlinear laser scanning microscopy data and image analysis. The effects of AFM tip dimensions and AFM cantilever stiffness were systematically investigated. The indentation tests were performed along the sagittal and coronal planes for an evaluation of the VF anisotropy. Hertzian contact theory was used along with the governing equations of linear poroelasticity to calculate the diffusivity coefficient of the tissue from AFM indentation creep testing. The permeability coefficient of the porcine VF was found to be 1.80±0.32×10(-15)m(4)/Ns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.