Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23829711›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on therapeutic targets2013

CD8(+) T cells in multiple sclerosis.

Aleksandar Denic, Bharath Wootla, Moses Rodriguez

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on therapeutic targets, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Safety and efficacy of cladribine in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Sarcoidosis as an Autoimmune Disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Bystander activated CD8Nature communications · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. CD8Molecular neurodegeneration · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aleksandar DenicDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905 , USA.
Bharath Wootla
Moses Rodriguez
Weatherford College · USWinnMed · US

Funding

Mayo Clinic Center for Translational Science ActivitiesUL1TR000135 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KHOSLA, SUNDEEP · 2012 to 2015
$41.2M
Nanopore Biosensor for Kinetics of Reparative Antibodies on Plasma MembranesR01GM092993 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI OH, SANG-HYUN · 2010 to 2013
$1.6M
Genetic Analysis of Spontaneous RemyelinationR01NS048357 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI BIEBER, ALLAN JAMES · 2008 to 2011
$1.0M
Clinical Translation of a Neuron Protective Recombinant Human AntibodyR21NS073684 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI RODRIGUEZ, MOSES · 2011 to 2012
$434k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000135NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM092993NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS048357NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS073684
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCD8(+) T cells were originally considered to exert a suppressive role in demyelinating disease because of bias toward the CD4(+) T cell-mediated experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, the most common multiple sclerosis (MS) model. However, recent studies of human MS lesion samples and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) provided compelling evidence about the pathogenic role of CD8(+) T cells. In this article, we discuss the theoretical roles of different CD8(+) T-cell subsets in MS. AREAS COVERED: A revised focus from CD4(+) to CD8(+) T cell-mediated demyelinating disease is summarized. Clonal expansion of CD8(+) T cells in MS lesions and in vitro evidence that CD8(+) T cells injure every central nervous system (CNS) cell type and transect axons are discussed. The role of CD8(+) T cells in two animal models of MS and of regulatory, interleukin (IL)-17-secreting CD8(+) T cells is reviewed. Lastly, an overview about the pathogenic and/or beneficial role of various CD8(+) T-cell subsets is offered. EXPERT OPINION: Growing evidence supports the pathogenic role of CD8(+) T cells. Clonally expanded CD8(+) T cells within MS lesions may damage the nervous system. Revealing the specific antigen is critical to design novel efficient treatments with minimal adverse effects. Increasing evidence exists for the role of regulatory, IL-17-secreting CD8(+) T cells in MS.

Indexed as

AnimalsCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCentral Nervous SystemGenes, MHC Class IHumansInterleukin-17Multiple SclerosisInterleukin-17

Identifiers

PMID23829711
PMCPMC3928018
OpenAlexW2054395536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.