ArticleJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology2013
A geometric interpretation for local alignment-free sequence comparison.
Article in Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimal choice of word length when comparing two Markov sequences using a χBMC genomics · 2017Article
- Inference of Markovian properties of molecular sequences from NGS data and applications to comparative genomics.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2016Article
- The Amordad database engine for metagenomics.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2014Article
- Sequence analysis by iterated maps, a review.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Local alignment-free sequence comparison arises in the context of identifying similar segments of sequences that may not be alignable in the traditional sense. We propose a randomized approximation algorithm that is both accurate and efficient. We show that under D2 and its important variant [Formula: see text] as the similarity measure, local alignment-free comparison between a pair of sequences can be formulated as the problem of finding the maximum bichromatic dot product between two sets of points in high dimensions. We introduce a geometric framework that reduces this problem to that of finding the bichromatic closest pair (BCP), allowing the properties of the underlying metric to be leveraged. Local alignment-free sequence comparison can be solved by making a quadratic number of alignment-free substring comparisons. We show both theoretically and through empirical results on simulated data that our approximation algorithm requires a subquadratic number of such comparisons and trades only a small amount of accuracy to achieve this efficiency. Therefore, our algorithm can extend the current usage of alignment-free-based methods and can also be regarded as a substitute for local alignment algorithms in many biological studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.