Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23829427›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2013

Transcriptomic and phylogenetic analysis of a bacterial cell cycle reveals strong associations between gene co-expression and evolution.

Gang Fang, Karla D Passalacqua, Jason Hocking, Paula Montero Llopis, Mark Gerstein, Nicholas H Bergman, Christine Jacobs-Wagner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Protein Quality Control Network inFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Dynamic translation regulation in Caulobacter cell cycle control.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  16. Cell cycle progression in Caulobacter requires a nucleoid-associated protein with high AT sequence recognition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gang FangDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA. christine.jacobs-wagner@yale.edu.
Karla D Passalacqua
Jason Hocking
Paula Montero Llopis
Mark Gerstein
Nicholas H Bergman
Christine Jacobs-Wagner
Yale University · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Temporal and Spatial Control of the Cell Cycle in Caulobacter CrescentusR01GM065835 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI JACOBS-WAGNER, CHRISTINE · 2003 to 2016
$3.7M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS GM065835NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM065835
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe genetic network involved in the bacterial cell cycle is poorly understood even though it underpins the remarkable ability of bacteria to proliferate. How such network evolves is even less clear. The major aims of this work were to identify and examine the genes and pathways that are differentially expressed during the Caulobacter crescentus cell cycle, and to analyze the evolutionary features of the cell cycle network.

resultsWe used deep RNA sequencing to obtain high coverage RNA-Seq data of five C. crescentus cell cycle stages, each with three biological replicates. We found that 1,586 genes (over a third of the genome) display significant differential expression between stages. This gene list, which contains many genes previously unknown for their cell cycle regulation, includes almost half of the genes involved in primary metabolism, suggesting that these "house-keeping" genes are not constitutively transcribed during the cell cycle, as often assumed. Gene and module co-expression clustering reveal co-regulated pathways and suggest functionally coupled genes. In addition, an evolutionary analysis of the cell cycle network shows a high correlation between co-expression and co-evolution. Most co-expression modules have strong phylogenetic signals, with broadly conserved genes and clade-specific genes predominating different substructures of the cell cycle co-expression network. We also found that conserved genes tend to determine the expression profile of their module.

conclusionWe describe the first phylogenetic and single-nucleotide-resolution transcriptomic analysis of a bacterial cell cycle network. In addition, the study suggests how evolution has shaped this network and provides direct biological network support that selective pressure is not on individual genes but rather on the relationship between genes, which highlights the importance of integrating phylogenetic analysis into biological network studies.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeBacterial ProteinsCaulobacter crescentusCell CycleChromosome MappingEvolution, MolecularGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGene OntologyGene Regulatory NetworksGenes, BacterialGenes, EssentialMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMultigene FamilyPhylogenyRNA, BacterialSequence Analysis, RNABacterial ProteinsRNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID23829427
PMCPMC3829707
OpenAlexW2125211394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.