Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23828786›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2013

Towards building a disease-phenotype knowledge base: extracting disease-manifestation relationship from literature.

Rong Xu, Li Li, Quanqiu Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Recent advances in biomedical literature mining.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Rare disease knowledge enrichment through a data-driven approach.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Disease comorbidity-guided drug repositioning: a case study in schizophrenia.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rong XuMedical Informatics Program, Center for Clinical Investigation, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. rxx@case.edu
Li Li
Quanqiu Wang

Funding

CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024989 · NCRR · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, PAMELA B · 2007 to 2011
$53.7M
TRAINING IN COMPUTATIONAL GENOMIC EPIDEMIOLOGY OF CANCERR25CA094186 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI LI, LI · 2002 to 2016
$6.8M
Obesity-Related Insulin Resistance Signaling Pathway Factors and Colon CancerR01CA136726 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI LI, LI · 2009 to 2013
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA136726NCI NIH HHS R25 CA094186NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024989
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationSystems approaches to studying phenotypic relationships among diseases are emerging as an active area of research for both novel disease gene discovery and drug repurposing. Currently, systematic study of disease phenotypic relationships on a phenome-wide scale is limited because large-scale machine-understandable disease-phenotype relationship knowledge bases are often unavailable. Here, we present an automatic approach to extract disease-manifestation (D-M) pairs (one specific type of disease-phenotype relationship) from the wide body of published biomedical literature. DATA AND

methodsOur method leverages external knowledge and limits the amount of human effort required. For the text corpus, we used 119 085 682 MEDLINE sentences (21 354 075 citations). First, we used D-M pairs from existing biomedical ontologies as prior knowledge to automatically discover D-M-specific syntactic patterns. We then extracted additional pairs from MEDLINE using the learned patterns. Finally, we analysed correlations between disease manifestations and disease-associated genes and drugs to demonstrate the potential of this newly created knowledge base in disease gene discovery and drug repurposing.

resultsIn total, we extracted 121 359 unique D-M pairs with a high precision of 0.924. Among the extracted pairs, 120 419 (99.2%) have not been captured in existing structured knowledge sources. We have shown that disease manifestations correlate positively with both disease-associated genes and drug treatments.

conclusionsThe main contribution of our study is the creation of a large-scale and accurate D-M phenotype relationship knowledge base. This unique knowledge base, when combined with existing phenotypic, genetic and proteomic datasets, can have profound implications in our deeper understanding of disease etiology and in rapid drug repurposing. AVAILABILITY: http://nlp.case.edu/public/data/DMPatternUMLS/

Indexed as

Drug RepositioningKnowledge BasesMEDLINEPhenotypeData MiningDiseaseHumansSearch Engine

Identifiers

PMID23828786
PMCPMC4068009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.