ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2013
Is AD a homogeneous nosologic entity? Yes.
Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most prevalent disorder causing dementia, is considered a neurodegenerative disease. The cause is unknown for over 95% of the cases who do not have a genetic disease and the pathogenetic mechanisms are incompletely known. The main hypotheses to explain the lesions and the decline in brain functioning are the amyloid cascade and the abnormal phosphorylation of tau protein, which are the grounds for the typical AD lesions: senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. Some observations, however, indicate that the relationship between those mechanisms, structural changes, and cognitive state is not univocal or specific. On the other hand, age at onset and clinical presentation are quite variable, as is the duration of the disease. As a matter of fact, a wide differential diagnosis may be necessary and, in the absence of a reliable diagnostic marker, the adscription to widely accepted criteria is compulsory. Nonetheless, the accuracy of the usually applied diagnostic criteria is around 80-90%. From a nosologic perspective, the current clinicopathological concept of AD, with unknown etiology, hypothetically variable pathogenesis, and wide clinical variability, justifies considering AD in a comprehensive manner. Therefore, a disorder primarily affecting structures in medial temporal lobe, with accumulation of amyloid β and abnormal tau, neuritic plaques and tangles, progressive loss of memory and/or other cognitive deficits, ultimately resulting in dementia should be classified as AD. Hopefully, scientific advances (in genetics, proteomics, metabolomics, etc.) will allow a more precise definition of the disease in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.