Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23828498›Full record

ReviewBreast cancer research and treatment2013

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in breast cancer.

Joseph Markowitz, Robert Wesolowski, Tracey Papenfuss, Taylor R Brooks, William E Carson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 104 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed, 174 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Circulating CD3Cancer medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The Tumor Immune Microenvironment in Breast Cancer Progression.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joseph MarkowitzDivision of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University, 320 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA. joseph.markowitz@osumc.edu
Robert Wesolowski
Tracey Papenfuss
Taylor R Brooks
William E Carson
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

TWO SIGNAL REQUIREMENT FOR NATURAL KILLER IMMUNITYP01CA095426 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CALIGIURI, MICHAEL A · 2002 to 2016
$29.6M
The Ohio State University Center for Clinical and Translational Science (UL1)UL1TR000090 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON, REBECCA D · 2012 to 2013
$7.9M
Tumor ImmunologyT32CA090223 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CARSON, WILLIAM E. · 2002 to 2023
$4.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000090NCI NIH HHS P01 CA095426NCI NIH HHS P01CA095426NCI NIH HHS T32 CA090223NCI NIH HHS T32CA090223
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are a population of immature myeloid cells defined by their suppressive actions on immune cells such as T cells, dendritic cells, and natural killer cells. MDSCs typically are positive for the markers CD33 and CD11b but express low levels of HLADR in humans. In mice, MDSCs are typically positive for both CD11b and Gr1. These cells exert their suppressive activity on the immune system via the production of reactive oxygen species, arginase, and cytokines. These factors subsequently inhibit the activity of multiple protein targets such as the T cell receptor, STAT1, and indoleamine-pyrrole 2,3-dioxygenase. The numbers of MDSCs tend to increase with cancer burden while inhibiting MDSCs improves disease outcome in murine models. MDSCs also inhibit immune cancer therapeutics. In light of the poor prognosis of metastatic breast cancer in women and the correlation of increasing levels of MDSCs with increasing disease burden, the purposes of this review are to (1) discuss why MDSCs may be important in breast cancer, (2) describe model systems used to study MDSCs in vitro and in vivo, (3) discuss mechanisms involved in MDSC induction/function in breast cancer, and (4) present pre-clinical and clinical studies that explore modulation of the MDSC-immune system interaction in breast cancer. MDSCs inhibit the host immune response in breast cancer patients and diminishing MDSC actions may improve therapeutic outcomes.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone Marrow CellsBreast NeoplasmsCytokinesDisease Models, AnimalFemaleGenes, Tumor SuppressorHumansImmunotherapyIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMiceMice, TransgenicMyeloid CellsOncolytic VirotherapyPredictive Value of TestsReactive Oxygen SpeciesCytokinesIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsReactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID23828498
PMCPMC3773691
OpenAlexW2051998002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.