Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23828372›Full record

GuidelineNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2013

Guidelines from The Italian Neurological and Neuroradiological Societies for the use of magnetic resonance imaging in daily life clinical practice of multiple sclerosis patients.

Massimo Filippi, Maria A Rocca, Stefano Bastianello, Giancarlo Comi, Paolo Gallo, Massimo Gallucci, Angelo Ghezzi, Maria Giovanna Marrosu, Giorgio Minonzio, Patrizia Pantano and 7 more

Abstract readPractice GuidelineReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Prognostic Accuracy of NEDA-3 in Long-term Outcomes of Multiple Sclerosis.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Two-year follow-up during fingolimod treatment in a pediatric multiple sclerosis patient still active on first-line treatment.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Massimo FilippiNeuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy, m.filippi@hsr.it.
Maria A Rocca
Stefano Bastianello
Giancarlo Comi
Paolo Gallo
Massimo Gallucci
Angelo Ghezzi
Maria Giovanna Marrosu
Giorgio Minonzio
Patrizia Pantano
Carlo Pozzilli
Gioacchino Tedeschi
Maria Trojano
Andrea Falini
Nicola De Stefano
Neuroimaging and MS Study Groups of the Italian Society of Neurology
Functional Neuroradiology Section of the Italian Association of Neuroradiology

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MRI is highly sensitive in detecting focal white matter lesions in multiple sclerosis (MS). For this reason, it has been formally included in the diagnostic workup of patients with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of MS, through the definition of ad hoc sets of criteria to show disease dissemination in space and time. MRI is used in virtually all clinical trials of the disease as a surrogate measure of treatment response. Several guidelines have been published to help characterizing the imaging features on conventional MR sequences of "typical" MS lesions and work has also been performed to identify "red flags" which should alert the clinicians to exclude possible alternative conditions. Despite this, the application of the available guidelines and criteria in daily life clinical practice is still limited and varies among and within countries (including Italy) due to regulatory issues and heterogeneity of MRI facilities. It is crucial for neurologists and neuroradiologists to become familiar with these criteria to improve the quality of their diagnostic assessment. In patients with established MS, the main problem is to define standard procedures for monitoring the course of the disease and treatment response. This review aims at providing daily life guidelines to clinicians for a correct application of MRI in the workup of patients suspected of having MS as well as in the monitoring of disease evolution in those with established MS. It also offers clues for the standardization of MRI studies and relative reporting to be applied at a national level.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingBrainHumansMultiple Sclerosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.