Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23828197›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2013

The impact of nitric oxide toxicity on the evolution of the glutathione transferase superfamily: a proposal for an evolutionary driving force.

Alessio Bocedi, Raffaele Fabrini, Andrea Farrotti, Lorenzo Stella, Albert J Ketterman, Jens Z Pedersen, Nerino Allocati, Peter C K Lau, Stephan Grosse, Lindsay D Eltis and 11 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Glutathione-Biomolecules · 2022
    Article
  7. The Relationship of Glutathione-Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 11 institutions in 6 countries.

Alessio BocediDepartment of Chemical Sciences and Technologies, University of Rome, Tor Vergata, Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Raffaele Fabrini
Andrea Farrotti
Lorenzo Stella
Albert J Ketterman
Jens Z Pedersen
Nerino Allocati
Peter C K Lau
Stephan Grosse
Lindsay D Eltis
Antonio Ruzzini
Thomas E Edwards
Laura Morici
Erica Del Grosso
Leonardo Guidoni
Daniele Bovi
Mario Lo Bello
Giorgio Federici
Michael W Parker
Philip G Board
Giorgio Ricci
Sapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · ITAustralian National University · AUBambino Gesù Children's Hospital · ITJoint Center for Structural Genomics · USMahidol University · THMcGill University · CANational Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine · USThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · IT

Funding

European Research Council 240624
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glutathione transferases (GSTs) are protection enzymes capable of conjugating glutathione (GSH) to toxic compounds. During evolution an important catalytic cysteine residue involved in GSH activation was replaced by serine or, more recently, by tyrosine. The utility of these replacements represents an enigma because they yield no improvements in the affinity toward GSH or in its reactivity. Here we show that these changes better protect the cell from nitric oxide (NO) insults. In fact the dinitrosyl·diglutathionyl·iron complex (DNDGIC), which is formed spontaneously when NO enters the cell, is highly toxic when free in solution but completely harmless when bound to GSTs. By examining 42 different GSTs we discovered that only the more recently evolved Tyr-based GSTs display enough affinity for DNDGIC (KD < 10(-9) M) to sequester the complex efficiently. Ser-based GSTs and Cys-based GSTs show affinities 10(2)-10(4) times lower, not sufficient for this purpose. The NO sensitivity of bacteria that express only Cys-based GSTs could be related to the low or null affinity of their GSTs for DNDGIC. GSTs with the highest affinity (Tyr-based GSTs) are also over-represented in the perinuclear region of mammalian cells, possibly for nucleus protection. On the basis of these results we propose that GST evolution in higher organisms could be linked to the defense against NO.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsBacteriaGlutathione TransferaseHumansNitric OxideGlutathione TransferaseNitric OxideDinitrosyl Iron ComplexEnzyme InhibitorsEnzymesEnzyme StructureEvolutionGlutathione TransferaseNitric Oxide

Identifiers

PMID23828197
PMCPMC3750189
OpenAlexW2093557227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.