Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23828147›Full record

ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2013

Revelations about carotid body function through its pathological role in resistant hypertension.

Julian F R Paton, Laura Ratcliffe, Dagmara Hering, Jacek Wolf, Paul A Sobotka, Krzysztof Narkiewicz

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current hypertension reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Neurocardiac Axis Physiology and Clinical Applications.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2024
    Review
  8. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor: mechanisms and advances in therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024 · on this map
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Intra-carotid body inter-cellular communication.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Julian F R PatonSchool of Physiology & Pharmacology, Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Medical Sciences Building, Bristol, England, UK. Julian.F.R.Paton@Bristol.ac.uk
Laura Ratcliffe
Dagmara Hering
Jacek Wolf
Paul A Sobotka
Krzysztof Narkiewicz
Gdańsk Medical University · PLNIHR Bristol Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/12/6/29670
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much recent attention has been given to the carotid body because of its potential role in cardiovascular disease states. One disease, neurogenic hypertension, characterised by excessive sympathetic activity, appears dependent on carotid body activity that may or may not be accompanied by sleep-disordered breathing. Herein, we review recent literature suggesting that the carotid body acquires tonicity in hypertension. We predict that carotid glomectomy will be a powerful way to temper excessive sympathetic discharge in diseases such as hypertension. We propose a model to explain that signalling from the 'hypertensive' carotid body is tonic, and hypothesise that there will be a sub-population of glomus cells that channel separately into reflex pathways controlling sympathetic motor outflows.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarotid BodyChemoreceptor CellsHumansHypertensionReflexSleep Apnea SyndromesSympathetic Nervous System

Identifiers

PMID23828147
PMCPMC3712134
OpenAlexW2102749530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.