ArticleIntensive care medicine2013
Quality improvement of interdisciplinary rounds by leadership training based on essential quality indicators of the Interdisciplinary Rounds Assessment Scale.
Article in Intensive care medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Collective leadership to improve professional practice, healthcare outcomes and staff well-being.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Effect of a quality improvement program on weaning from mechanical ventilation: a cluster randomized trial.Intensive care medicine · 2015Trial
- Article
- Developing Leadership: The Integrative Approach of Pro●Leader Intervention Program.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Maximizing the Impact and ROI of Leadership Development: A Theory- and Evidence-Informed Framework.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Gold standard research and evidence applied: The Inspire Nursing Leadership Program.Healthcare management forum · 2024Article
- Conducting a good ward round: How do leaders do it?Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2022Article
- Observation for assessment of clinician performance: a narrative review.BMJ quality & safety · 2016Review
- From weaning theory to practice: implementation of a quality improvement program in ICU.Intensive care medicine · 2015Article
- Article
- Measurement properties and implementation of a checklist to assess leadership skills during interdisciplinary rounds in the intensive care unit.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2015Article
- Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine 2013: II. Sedation, invasive and noninvasive ventilation, airways, ARDS, ECMO, family satisfaction, end-of-life care, organ donation, informed consent, safety, hematological issues in critically ill patients.Intensive care medicine · 2014Article
- Quality improvement of interdisciplinary rounds by leadership training based on essential quality indicators of the Interdisciplinary Rounds Assessment Scale.Intensive care medicine · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe implementation of interdisciplinary teams in the intensive care unit (ICU) has focused attention on leadership behavior. Daily interdisciplinary rounds (IDRs) in ICUs integrate leadership behavior and interdisciplinary teamwork. The purpose of this intervention study was to measure the effect of leadership training on the quality of IDRs in the ICU.
methodsA nonrandomized intervention study was conducted in four ICUs for adults. The intervention was a 1-day training session in a simulation environment and workplace-based feedback sessions. Measurement included 28 videotaped IDRs (total, 297 patient presentations) that were assessed with 10 essential quality indicators of the validated IDR Assessment Scale. Participants were 19 intensivists who previously had no formal training in leading IDRs. They were subdivided by cluster sampling into a control group (ten experienced intensivists) and intervention group (nine intensive care fellows). Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare results between control and intervention groups.
resultsBaseline measurements of control and intervention groups revealed two indicators that differed significantly. The frequency of yes ratings for the intervention group significantly increased for seven of the ten indicators from before to after intervention. The frequency of yes ratings after training was significantly greater in the intervention than control groups for eight of the ten essential quality indicators.
conclusionsThe leadership training improved the quality of the IDRs performed in the ICUs. This may improve quality and safety of patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.