ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2013
Evolution of protein indels in plants, animals and fungi.
Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Causal variants in animal genomes: approaches to identification, phenotypic impact, and implications for selective breeding.BMC genomics · 2026Review
- Comparative Analysis of Evolutionary Distances Using the GenusInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Proposed EU NGT legislation in light of plant genetic variation.Plant biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- Plastome phylogenomics unravels the evolutionary relationships and biogeographic history of Chloranthaceae.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Review
- BetaAlign: a deep learning approach for multiple sequence alignment.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of SNPs and InDels ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Protein Fold Usages in Ribosomes: Another Glance to the Past.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- A Probabilistic Model for Indel Evolution: Differentiating Insertions from Deletions.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Evolution of ribosomal protein network architectures.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Genetic Diversity ofFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Accessing unexplored regions of sequence space in directed enzyme evolution via insertion/deletion mutagenesis.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Whole genome detection of sequence and structural polymorphism in six diverse horses.PloS one · 2020Article
- Causes and Effects of Loss of Classical Nonhomologous End Joining Pathway in Parasitic Eukaryotes.mBio · 2019Article
- Article
- Different Ways of Doing the Same: Variations in the Two Last Steps of the Purine Biosynthetic Pathway in Prokaryotes.Genome biology and evolution · 2019Article
- Identification of expressed R-genes associated with leaf spot diseases in cultivated peanut.Molecular biology reports · 2019Article
- Contributions of substitutions and indels to the structural variations in ancient protein superfamilies.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- Genome-wide identification and characterization of InDels and SNPs in Glycine max and Glycine soja for contrasting seed permeability traits.BMC plant biology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInsertions/deletions (indels) in protein sequences are useful as drug targets, protein structure predictors, species diagnostics and evolutionary markers. However there is limited understanding of indel evolutionary patterns. We sought to characterize indel patterns focusing first on the major groups of multicellular eukaryotes.
resultsComparisons of complete proteomes from a taxonically broad set of primarily Metazoa, Fungi and Viridiplantae yielded 299 substantial (>250aa) universal, single-copy (in-paralog only) proteins, from which 901 simple (present/absent) and 3,806 complex (multistate) indels were extracted. Simple indels are mostly small (1-7aa) with a most frequent size class of 1aa. However, even these simple looking indels show a surprisingly high level of hidden homoplasy (multiple independent origins). Among the apparently homoplasy-free simple indels, we identify 69 potential clade-defining indels (CDIs) that may warrant closer examination. CDIs show a very uneven taxonomic distribution among Viridiplante (13 CDIs), Fungi (40 CDIs), and Metazoa (0 CDIs). An examination of singleton indels shows an excess of insertions over deletions in nearly all examined taxa. This excess averages 2.31 overall, with a maximum observed value of 7.5 fold.
conclusionsWe find considerable potential for identifying taxon-marker indels using an automated pipeline. However, it appears that simple indels in universal proteins are too rare and homoplasy-rich to be used for pure indel-based phylogeny. The excess of insertions over deletions seen in nearly every genome and major group examined maybe useful in defining more realistic gap penalties for sequence alignment. This bias also suggests that insertions in highly conserved proteins experience less purifying selection than do deletions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.